<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hagel and the Jewish lobby: The (half) truth hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/hagel-and-the-jewish-lobby-the-half-truth-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/hagel-and-the-jewish-lobby-the-half-truth-hurts/</link>
	<description>The Marketplace of Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:49:51 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle Pudlowski Eissenstat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/hagel-and-the-jewish-lobby-the-half-truth-hurts/#comment-101062</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle Pudlowski Eissenstat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/?p=92498#comment-101062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry I clicked &quot;Comment&quot; too soon! 
Point [3] Matt&#039;s statement &quot;Mersheimer and Walt’s controversial book The Israel Lobby established a sort of middle ground&quot; is hardly approaching the middle ground of anything but outrageous unproven claims that incite to Jew-hatred. That is why the book is not only controversial; it is unsound and an embarrassment to have been written by so-called academic professors.

Regarding Hagel: if the politician had NEVER said &quot;Jewish&quot; he still would be a questionable candidate due to his antiGay remarks. But his denigrating proIsrael Americans lobbying within their legal rights obfuscates or deflects thinking about his antiGay attitudes and his alarmingly dim-witted confirmation hearing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I clicked &quot;Comment&quot; too soon!<br />
Point [3] Matt&#039;s statement &quot;Mersheimer and Walt’s controversial book The Israel Lobby established a sort of middle ground&quot; is hardly approaching the middle ground of anything but outrageous unproven claims that incite to Jew-hatred. That is why the book is not only controversial; it is unsound and an embarrassment to have been written by so-called academic professors.</p>
<p>Regarding Hagel: if the politician had NEVER said &quot;Jewish&quot; he still would be a questionable candidate due to his antiGay remarks. But his denigrating proIsrael Americans lobbying within their legal rights obfuscates or deflects thinking about his antiGay attitudes and his alarmingly dim-witted confirmation hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle Pudlowski Eissenstat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/hagel-and-the-jewish-lobby-the-half-truth-hurts/#comment-101060</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle Pudlowski Eissenstat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/?p=92498#comment-101060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things in this piece that seem irrational in a purportedly thoughtful even handed opinion piece:
[1] Selectively picking upon an AIPAC booth at Hillel among numerous others covering a broad spectrum of Jewish groups? Matt admits there were many other choices. Why get upset that a single 1 was there that he does not approve of? Sounds like an open approach but he disapproves. Would he refuse to include groups he disagrees with? That Hillel sounds less prejudiced.
[2] AIPAC has refused to fight against the Hagel nomination. Matt is not telling the truth in his last paragraph. A self respecting journalist checks before making such a statement.
[3] &quot;Mersheimer and Walt’s controversial book The Israel Lobby established a sort of middle ground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things in this piece that seem irrational in a purportedly thoughtful even handed opinion piece:<br />
[1] Selectively picking upon an AIPAC booth at Hillel among numerous others covering a broad spectrum of Jewish groups? Matt admits there were many other choices. Why get upset that a single 1 was there that he does not approve of? Sounds like an open approach but he disapproves. Would he refuse to include groups he disagrees with? That Hillel sounds less prejudiced.<br />
[2] AIPAC has refused to fight against the Hagel nomination. Matt is not telling the truth in his last paragraph. A self respecting journalist checks before making such a statement.<br />
[3] &quot;Mersheimer and Walt’s controversial book The Israel Lobby established a sort of middle ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.406 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-20 01:25:00 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->