I will never forget leading my troops up to the crest of the ridge. Quietly, stealthily, we crept up the sand dune until we could just peek over the top. I waved to the others to follow me, staking out their position, so that we were shielded.
Pointing out the imaginary Russian Special Ops forces landing on this Cape Cod beach, I instructed my troops to ready their weapons. When the enemy got close, we fired, and the battle commenced.
* * *
You may be wondering what on earth I am describing. As most of you know, I’ve never served in the military.
This Shabbat we honored those who served our country in our armed forces. It was so powerful to hear how they served. Their bravery and dedication know no bounds; we all thank them for their service.
Somehow as a child, I internalized what I thought was the excitement of serving in the military. Growing up in the 1970s and 1980s, I felt that Russia was our enemy and that war with them could be imminent.
The Cold War was real.
And somehow I loved guns, although my parents forbade the purchase of even toy guns, including squirt guns. My cousins and I would use sticks and even a table leg as pretend guns and rifles. It was quite a sight to see us holding up table legs and sticks, trying to aim.
Playing army was a past time that could occupy us for hours on end; attending to missions with zeal and intensity that we thought could be matched only by the real experience.
* * *
But toy guns are not real guns.
Did you know that the Bureau of Consumer Protections regulates toy guns, but, unbelievably, it does not regulate real guns?
Consequently, we do not have smart gun technology and other protections in place [See this newsclip about the ATF and how politics are preventing this bureau from doing its job!].
And this week, I stand before you once again in sadness due to another mass shooting by a violent, abusive man who was able to buy several guns because his name was not entered into the Federal list of those who are prohibited from buying guns. This man, who had smashed his infant step-son’s skull, was still able to purchase weapons including the military style assault rifle he used in this attack.
Enough is enough.
The current week’s mass shooting — it seems that we have one every week — hit particularly close to home. That an ex-military criminal could walk into a church that his ex-wife’s mother attended to act out some kind of deranged revenge fantasy is frightening to us all.
Learning that there is no place that is free of violence fills us with fear and sadness and hearing that the pastor’s 14-year-old daughter was murdered hit particularly close to home.
- Annabelle “Belle” Pomeroy, 14, daughter of the regular pastor
- Haley Krueger, 16
- Lula White, 71
- Keith Braden, 62
- Peggy Warden, 56
- Dennis Johnson, Sr., 77
- Sara Johnson, 68
- Ricardo Rodriguez, 64
- Therese Rodriguez, 66
- Robert Marshall, 56
- Karen Marshall, 56
- Robert Corrigan, 51
- Shani Corrigan, 51
- Joann Ward, 30
- Emily Garcia, 7, daughter of Joann Ward
- Brooke Ward, 5, daughter of Joann Ward
- Tara E. McNulty, 33, close friend of the Holcombe family
- Bryan Holcombe, 60, serving as the guest pastor
- Karla Holcombe, 58
- Marc “Danny” Holcombe, 36, son of John and Karla
- Noah Holcombe, 18-months old, daughter of Danny Holcombe
- Crystal Holcombe, 36, daughter-in-law of John and Karla, pregnant at time of shooting
- Gregory Hill, 13, son of Crystal Holcombe
- Emily Hill, 11, daughter of Crystal Holcombe
- Megan Hill, 9, daughter of Crystal Holcombe
The murder of all these people overwhelms us with grief.
Enough is enough.
* * *
I stand before you this morning to speak out on an issue that has been close to my heart for decades.
As most of you know, I have been working to help strengthen common sense gun laws to protect all of us, most especially our children and grandchildren.
After the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona seven years ago, I started an organization called Clergy Against Bullets, to ban high-capacity cartridges that were available for purchase at Walmart — no background check required.
While it has not been all failures, there have been times when I have felt like I was tilting at windmills.
Gun manufacturers make billions of dollars; in 2012, this industry grossed $31.8 billion dollars. Then, these gun manufacturers turn around and give hundred of millions to prevent any gun research or gun protections; they give this money to the NRA, lobbying firms, and to political campaigns and politicians.
This is a circle — gun money to the NRA to the politicians to prevent anything to save lives. The only goal is to enable people to buy more guns. A circle, a circle of death and profit off of death. There is a reason there is almost one gun per person in this country — the highest ratio by far in the Western world. [See the relevant statistics in Nicholas Kristof’s op-ed about the public health crisis.]
The majority of the 32,000 people killed each year in the U.S. are suicides; those are still murders. This is an indictment of our inadequate efforts to treat mental illness and prevent its sufferers from obtaining weapons that make taking their lives far too easy.
Gun deaths occur in homes as accidents, in domestic abuse situations, in confrontations, in violence associated with drugs and gangs, and by people who can far too easily purchase a bump stock which turns their legally obtained assault rifles into the equivalent of an automatic weapon so they can kill 58 people in Las Vegas from their hotel room in a matter of seconds.
Is this what we want in our country?
Is this an America we can be proud of?
Are we all not ashamed and appalled?
Enough is enough.
In order not to be too demoralized, I will highlight some of our successes:
- In 2012, I was among a group of religious leaders who met with Senator Scott Brown who, as a Republican, cast the deciding vote to defeat conceal and carry reciprocity. This most dangerous bill that has been recently reintroduced to Congress would force states like our own to accept conceal and carry permits from states with particularly weak laws. If this happens, it will endanger our lives and it should be fought with vigor.
- In our own Commonwealth of Massachusetts, we were able to pass new gun legislation that has strengthened our existing gun laws giving our state the lowest rate of gun deaths per capita in the U.S. today.
- Thanks to numerous programs, such as Sandy Hook Promise, people are more aware of the dangers of gun violence and how bullying influences these issues.
Sadly, after seven years of work, we have not been able to successfully pass one piece of federal legislation. We have not yet been able to do the following, which we need to do:
Have comprehensive and consistent federal gun legislation, urging our legislators to:
- Restore public access to crime gun trace data
- Require criminal background checks for all guns sold in the U.S.
- Promote the research into and use of Smart Gun Technology
- Limit how many guns one person can buy in one transaction and can own
- Renew the assault weapons ban
- Outlaw high-capacity magazines
- Support efforts to close the private sale loophole
* * *
What does our tradition teach about gun violence?
While guns were not yet invented when many of our texts were written, Jewish sources do have relevance here.
Concerned about the danger of weapons falling into the wrong hands and to prevent arms trafficking, our ancient rabbis set stringent guidelines not only for the sale of weapons, but also for the sale of material that could be used to make weapons. “What is the reason [that you cannot sell even material]? Because they can be flattened out and weapons made from them.” (B. Talmud Avodah Zarah 15b-16a)
And the Talmud also teaches: “Whoever is able to protest against the [sins of the] people of his household and does not protest is caught in the [sins] of his household; against [the sins of] the people of his city [and does not protest] is caught in the [sins] of the people of his city; against [the sins of] the whole world [and does not protest] is caught in the [sins] of the whole world.” (Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 54b)
This applies in many situations: if we can speak out when something is wrong, we must. If we do not take action to save a life, we are complicit.
We are guilty.
And finally, our Mishnah states famously: “If you save one life, it is as if you saved the world, (Sanhedrin 4:5) reminding us that every human is infinitely precious and saves not only that person, but also their future generations.
Have we done all we can to save even just one life from gun violence?
* * *
This week’s Torah reading, parashat Hayyei Sarah, opens with Sarah’s death. In the ensuing verses, Abraham purchases a burial plot for his wife and buries her, the first burial in the Torah.
In our tradition, participating in the preparation for burial or the internment itself is called the hesed shel emet — the truest act of loving kindness.
Thus we elevate this as a particularly praise-worthy mitzvah — whether we are helping with the funeral or the shivah arrangements, lovingly preparing the body through tahara (spiritual purification of the body), or whether we are covering the coffin with earth at the cemetery.
Friends, there have been far too many funerals from gun violence.
Hundreds of thousands of people have been murdered in our country and while we could point to all of the contributing factors, including violence in our culture, people with anger issues, and the glorification of guns, the bottom line is that there are too many guns in the hands of people who should not have them.
Enough is enough.
* * *
Even though Australia participates in the same Western culture as we do with its violent movies and violent video games, it was able to significantly diminish the rate of gun deaths through common-sense legislation.
There is no reason that we cannot do the same (see Jon Oliver here).
This is not rocket science.
The Second Amendment wanted to make sure we could have guns for an armed militia before we had organized armed forces, National Guard, and armed police forces, not so deranged domestic abusers could obtain dozens of assault rifles.
And even if you disagree with me and still believe we need guns, we can all agree that we can do better.
We can come up with protections like those they have in Israel to help those who are stable and responsible still have guns, while cutting down on the carnage.
* * *
This summer, I decided that as an activist for common-sense gun safety, I needed to learn more about these weapons.
So, I visited a nearby gun range with a responsible gun owner. I was truly impressed by how this person transported guns in separate locked bags with the gun locks on each gun and having the bullets in another locked container.
We brought in all these armaments and learned how to clean, load and handle these arms.
Then I learned how to shoot. I guess those years of playing soldier helped since I was actually a decent shot….
But I came away with three thoughts:
First, how a person who is extremely conscientious, could probably own and store and handle guns safely. I am not sure how many U.S. gun owners fit that high standard.
Second, it is depressing to see how much fear there must be in our society that so many people feel they need a gun. We actually live in a safe time with low crime rate and the lowest homicide rate in decades.
Third, was the overwhelming feeling of deep, deep sadness. As I lifted a loaded weapon, I realized that I now possessed the power to take a life – my own, the person next to me in the range, anyone…. So easily…. I was frightened and needed to breathe to calm my own anxiety.
I come before you as a straight-shooter to say that:
Enough is enough.
We can do better and we must do better.
We can do better.
PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH YOUR NETWORKS!!
We strongly suggest that you plan to arrive early, ideally by 10:00 AM, for the hearing of the Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security on Thursday, Nov. 16.
We expect members of the Massachusetts NRA Affiliate, GOAL, to show up in large numbers to push for their agenda, especially the legalization of silencers in MA.
Arriving early will increase the likelihood of getting a good seat for the hearing!
Click here for hearing details. And remember to wear your orange t-shirts if you have them!
~ See you on Thursday ~
Other actions we can take:
- Support the “Where did the gun come from?” campaign of Citizens for Safety.
- Encourage parents to ask if the homes their children play in have guns – “Is there an unlocked gun in your home?”
- Oppose “Stand Your Ground” laws and “Concealed Carry” laws, especially conceal and carry reciprocity across state lines.
- Invite political leaders, mental health experts, and educators to our communities to share views and develop action plans to stop gun violence.
- Learn about the daily reality of urban gun violence from such organizations as Citizens for Safety and Stop Handgun Violence.
- Organize adult education programs to learn more about gun violence and what you can do.
- Organize programs for parents and children through religious schools, Jewish day schools, and youth groups to address issues of violence that touch all of us and the choices we can make in our own lives to help create a more nonviolent society.
- Dialogue with responsible gun owners so that, together, we can save lives.
“We may not sell to them armament nor accessories of armament. Just as it is forbidden to sell weapons to an idol worshipper, so it is forbidden to sell them to a Jewish robber…. We may not sell thick pieces of iron to them. What is the reason? Because they can be flattened out and weapons made from them.” (Babylonian Talmud Avodah Zarah 15b-16a)
We recommend the following resources for information and action suggestions concerning gun violence:
https://ragvtest.weebly.com/ (Rabbis Against Gun Violence)
http://faithsagainstgunviolence.org/ (Faiths United Against Gun Violence)
https://everytown.org/ (Everytown for Gun Safety)
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/clergyagainstbullets/ (Clergy Against Bullets)
http://donotstandidlyby.org/ (The Do Not Stand Idly By Campaign)
http://www.vpc.org/ (The Violence Policy Center)
http://www.stophandgunviolence.org/ (Stop Handgun Violence)
http://www.bradycampaign.org/ (The Brady Campaign)
Massachusetts Board of Rabbis Public Policy Statement (2013):
- Rabbinical Assembly Statements on Gun Violence
- RA 2014 – https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/story/resolution-sensible-gun-control-united-states
- RA 2013 – https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/story/resolution-against-gun-violence-united-states-0?tp=491
- RA 2011 – https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/story/resolution-high-capacity-ammunition-magazines?tp=212
- RA 1995 – https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/assets/public/social_action/resolutions/reolution-violence-and-gun-control-1995.pdf
- RA 1990 – https://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/assets/public/social_action/resolutions/omnibus-resolution-reaffirmation-1990.pdf
Once again, a student group at the University of Michigan has put forth a resolution to the Central Student Government asking the university Board of Regents to divest from several companies “that violate Palestinian human rights.” This is the eleventh resolution in 15 years; all preceding attempts have been voted down or failed. Nevertheless, a vocal minority chooses again to force this issue, and the whole campus must therefore enter once more into the land of futile effort and escalated inter-group division.
Divestment resolutions have become standard in efforts by the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement around the country to use universities and colleges as megaphones to broadcast a one-sided view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While some resolutions have passed select student governments, not a single university administration or board of regents has agreed to implement such a resolution.
This resolution to be voted on November 15 asks the regents to create a committee to “investigate the ethical and moral implications of our investments in the corporations Boeing, G4S, Hewlett-Packard, and United Technologies.” G4S has since been removed. A similar resolution campaign mounted last year unsuccessfully at George Washington University also targeted Boeing and Hewlett-Packard. The critical response there emphasized the failure of the resolution to recognize the right of all nations, including Israel, to act in their own self-defense. Other criticisms pointed out that a blanket corporate condemnation was inaccurate, as biometric technologies provided by Hewlett Packard would speed Palestinian passage at Israeli border checkpoints.
In such campaigns, truth is often the first casualty – supporters put forward a one-sided argument, omit important facts and context, and embrace a partisan orientation. Only this conflict, it is said, is important and requires UM action. The companies selected are also indicted as corporate monsters by virtue of their doing business in or with Israel. In the BDS-supported narrative, Israelis act badly and on behalf of evil. Palestinians do not act but are victims acted upon. The newest falsehood is that Palestinians, who are indistinguishable from Israelis in phenotype, are said to be people of color, and the passage or failure of the resolution is claimed to be a test of the University of Michigan’s commitment and welcome to students of color. With this last imaginative claim, we have entered a fictional world.
A second casualty is dialogue. Supporters of the BDS movement consistently oppose efforts to “normalize” the conflict, which means opposing any dialogue with Israelis or supporters of Israel. Usually any program involving joint work for peace is nixed. I met some students from the sponsoring organization Students Allied for Freedom and Equality (S.A.F.E.) at a teach-in I participated in at UM Friday who said they are indeed interested in dialogue. So too were some students with UM Hillel. This is truly hopeful, but at no other university has dialogue arisen out of or been sustained through a divestment campaign.
A third casualty is comity on campus, for conflict over the resolution leads directly to deepened divisions among groups of students and other members of the university community. Absent commitment to work together in real multi-group discussions or initiatives, the campus winds up more deeply divided than before.
It is easy to point out the tendentious and selective use of UN resolutions in the S.A.F.E. resolution and the lack of clarity about desired ultimate outcomes in the Middle East by the BDS-aligned group. This is not an initiative aimed at getting aid to or transforming conditions on the ground for Palestinians or beginning to end the occupation in the West Bank or Gaza; nor is it something oriented to changing incentives and conditions for both parties to re-enter negotiations. BDS leaders like Omar Barghouti have actually been quite clear in their desire that there be no Jewish state in the Middle East and their insistence that Jews have no right to be in the land or have their own state. UN Resolution 242, governing the situation since 1967, is partially understood, the campaign ignoring its clear call to support all states in the area to live in peace and security with respect to their sovereignty and territorial boundaries.
The effort by those behind the resolution to force-fit Israel/Palestine into the familiar paradigm and analogy of South African apartheid, allegedly struck down by heroic boycott action in the United States, is also a gross simplification, and allows students unfamiliar with sharp differences between Israel/Palestine and South Africa to signal their virtue by supporting divestment without real knowledge of the two cases. These are dissimilar rather than similar — one is about democratic conflict in a single polity between a minority majority and a majority minority, the other is about conflict between two peoples and national movements each seeking their own polity and group sovereignty. The analogy is wrong, malicious, and damaging to the process of seeking peace.
Let us return to the claim in the resolution that UM’s investments in companies doing business with Israel “personally impact Palestinian students at the University of Michigan,” and violate UM’s commitment to inclusive policies. “Palestinian students, as a minority group on campus, receive not the University’s full support, nor the benefits if its plan to foster a more inclusive climate, so long as a proportion of their tuition dollars is invested by the University in companies that violate Palestinian human rights in Israel.” This is overreach of the worst kind. Disagreement on investment portfolio choices in a non-political process does not mean that UM is hostile to or unsupportive of enrolled students from a specific ethnic or national group.
Finally, let us return to the wearying ubiquity of these resolutions. Again and again, student government is asked to involve itself in a polarizing issue that shifts its attentions and energies away from issues of real concern to all students, such as rising tuition and lagging financial aid. In a period when the politics of division plays well nationally, putting forward resolutions that will surely pit groups against one another on campus is perhaps not the best thing to do.