Israeli political expert, Benji Lovitt made two excellent points on the official newspaper of Israeli politics, Twitter:

And it’s true. Nefesh B’Nefesh indeed forgot to mention the war or election every so often. And I’m not sure which one of those I prefer.

As Israel likely officially moves towards new elections just two years after the previous ones, the big question is why? (Note: the term “likely officially” is a term so outrageous, it could only ever be associated with Israeli policy)

According to the most recent polls, Likud is expected to rise from 18 seats to 24 while Yisrael Beiteinu is expected to fall from 13 to 12.  Habayit Hayehudi, notwithstanding the in-fighting with Tekuma, is expected to rise from 12 to 16 seats.

On the left, Labor is expected to remain stagnant at 15 while Meretz rises from 6 to 8 seats. Tzipi Livni, unless she pulls off one of her signature “Livni maneuvers,” is expected not to make the next Knesset, nor is her former party, Kadima.

And the “big dog” of 2013, Yesh Atid? Expected to drop from 19 to 11 seats.

The remainder of the Knesset would be broken down to UTJ (8, up from 7), Shas (6, down from 11), Hadash (4, same as now), and Ra’am Ta’al/United Arab List (4, same as now).  Balaad also not projected to make the next Knesset.

Wondering where the other 12 seats went? To brand spankin’ new party, Moshe Kahlon!

(Polling data via Haaretz.)

The question though remains – why do we need new elections? All they do is herald the demise of Yesh Atid. Yes, its demise. Whether you voted for them or not and whether you plan on voting for them again or not doesn’t change the plain and simple fact that Israel’s election system has been set for years. It has the main two parties – Likud (or Herut) on the right and Labor (or Mapai) on the left. They wax and wane with the security and socio-economic situation.

It has its “clusters” of Mafdal/NRP/National Union/Habayit Hayehudi/Otzma L’Yisrael/you name it on the Religious Zionist/Right Wing camp, Meretz of the Progressive Zionist camp, the Haredim, and the Arabs. And then, the “new” party. It’s always there and always claims to be centrist. It’s been called “Shinui” and “Kadima” and “Yesh Atid.” In 2015, it will be called whatever Moshe Kahlon names his party. And they will be the big hit until the next election, likely in 2017, when they too will fall.

So who wins?

Certainly not the public. We bear the cost, projected to be upwards of 2 billion shekel. That money is raised by the government through taxes on us. Even if they don’t directly tax us to pay for that, the money must come from somewhere, so they simply divert other spending that otherwise would have benefited the public.

We also lose significantly through the instability. Instead of having a government actually govern, we continue the process of replacing the Education Minister every 2-3 years which means that once the school system finally adjusts to one guy, we have a new sheriff in town with an entirely different vision of how to proceed with education in Israel. It certainly doesn’t help when one is Religious Zionist and the next is Haredi and the next is secular. It’s completely unfair to children, parents, teachers, and school administrators alike who must constantly adjust to a constantly changing cycle. The same can be said for the changes in other ministries.

The parties who have the most influence in bringing about new elections, Yesh Atid (“There is a Future,” under the leadership of Yair Lapid) and Hatnuah (“The Movement,” under the leadership of Tzipi Livni) lose out by losing 8 seats for the former and an entire Knesset slate in the latter.

Nor will the left win, as any gains are minimal enough, offset by the completely unlikely chance that anyone from the Left or the Center (Herzog or Lapid) will be given a mandate to form a coalition.

Even Habayit Hayehudi (“The Jewish Home,” under the leadership of Naftali Bennett) may not be riding so high if he can’t get the party, including the Tekuma faction in check.

Sure Bibi grows a little bit, and he will likely form the next government with his “natural allies” plus the Haredim replacing Lapid and Livni, meaning still hampered for what he wants to do, just in a different direction.

So what’s the point? Everyone here (save maybe the Haredim) are losing in this battle. Even the Arabs should be opposed, as it will be harder for them to cross the raised electoral threshold, and Balaad may not even make the next Knesset. That Livni would want early elections that virtually every single poll shows her not even making is astounding.

It would be significantly cheaper to save the facade and just bring UTJ and Shas into the coalition now, considering that’s what will happen anyways. At current seat levels, even if Lapid and Livni leave, the coalition will remain with 62 seats. And while Bibi will be forced to put on hold any legislation he may have wanted against Haredi interests (whether compulsory IDF service for all, conversions, or marriage,) he will no longer be tied down in diplomatic/security moves he, Lieberman, and Bennett may want that Lapid and Livni have opposed (deportations, Knesset bill to oust enemies of the State, etc.).

New elections are supposed to for the benefit of the people considering Israel is a “democracy,” a representation of the people, by the people, for the people. But considering what’s at stake, how can anyone claim that elections will help the citizens of the State of Israel in any way, shape, or form?

Unless you’re looking forward to that extra day of vacation. Then I agree – big win for the people!