Danny Bloom
I seek the truth wherever it lies.

‘Cancel culture’ now reaches far and wide, thanks to a ‘wild wild Twitterworld’

Margaret Atwood has always been a strong critic of repression of speech. ​She and New Yorker magazine editor Jia Tolentino talked about this earlier this year. ​Most recently, ​Atwood​ has received attention for her signing of “A Letter on Justice and Open Debate,” also known as the Harper’s Letter, published in Harper’s Magazine on July 7.

The open letter was written to condemn ​so-called ​”cancel culture” and what it called an “intolerant climate.” It was signed by 153 high-profile signatories. ​In her chat with Tolentino, Atwood​ went on to compare the climate of the Twittersphere ​sometimes ​to the Salem Witch Trials. When there’s a moral panic going on, that’s what happens,” she said. “Moral panics feed on scapegoats.”

In some twitter posse communities in particular, the things people say and share are constantly scrutinized, and a single “wrong” tweet or statement from one or four years ago can ruin people’s credibility. This phenomenon is called “call-out culture,” or “cancel culture,” and involves the public denouncement of those perceived as misogynistic or perpetuating other forms of bigotry, according to academics studying the issues,

While many would agree that it is necessary to call out bigotry, the prevalence of call-out culture creates toxic online spaces that are not conducive for learning. Call-out culture presumes that humans are either born woke and are good, or weren’t and are bad. It fails to recognize that people are able to, and routinely do, develop new ideologies over time and shed ones that they’ve outgrown, according to sources.

This presumption is clear in terms of the common practice of users reposting or resharing problematic statements made long ago by others, and using that post to discredit anything that user says or believes now.A 20-year-old Twitter personality recently faced backlash for racist tweets he sent when he was 12. Before he could apologize for his past statements, he had to make his Twitter account private because of all the attacks he was facing.

It’s important for people to take responsibility for their past actions, but call-out culture does not give individuals being called out room to do so. Instead, the incriminating evidence equates to a person being “canceled” and any apologies they offer are dismissed. Given the fast-paced nature of social media, this means that people who are called out are often ostracized — immediately unfollowed or blocked — before they even get a chance to redeem themselves.

Additionally, ”call-out culture” often seems to diverge from its supposed intention of holding people accountable into a justification to insult and demean people. When someone on social media makes a mistake, they are often then not only denounced for that action but deemed completely unworthy as a person.

The main issue with call-out culture is that we lose opportunities to educate, especially within activist spaces. Instead of calling out people by insulting and shaming them, we would do better to take time to explain why what they said was hurtful or problematic, according to observers.

Some people ask: While some might argue that this education is labor, and too much unpaid labor can be detrimental to the activist doing it, how will we ever progress if we do not educate or do the labor of helping others learn? How do we win over new people and challenge problematic mindsets if we do not take the time to educate them?

Author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie made a similar argument in a speech at Harvard last May. Adichie gave an account of how a presenter at a talk in London mispronounced her name — calling her ”Chimichanga” instead of Chimamanda — even after they practiced how to pronounce it over and over. She then talked about how she re-told this story to a dinner party guest who then got angry that the presenter did not try harder. Adichie was not, however, angry at the presenter. She didn’t feel that the presenter had made a mistake out of malice or mockery, but had made it despite intending to pronounce her name right. Adichie herself used this anecdote to illustrate why people must check for intent and context, and be empathetic before rushing to attack others for statements they make!

“Think of people as people, not as abstractions who have to conform to bloodless logic but as people — fragile, imperfect, with prides that can be wounded and hearts that can be touched,” Adichie said. “Literature is my religion. I have learned from literature that we humans are flawed, all of us are flawed, but even while we are flawed, we are capable of enduring goodness.”

Of course, no matter how we approach them, not everyone wants to learn or examine their opinions. This reality should not blind us from the fact that many other people are willing to learn from their mistakes if given the opportunity and guidance to do so. ​As cancel culture reaches far and wide now in an unedited and unmoderated Twitter world, people can make things up about others, tell outrighth lies and forward old false narratives just to take part in what has become a very ugly and unproductive — and hurtful — unchecked and unvetted game by posses of bullies who should know better and do know better.

This is the Twitterworld we live in now.

About the Author
Dan Bloom curates The Cli-Fi Report at www.cli-fi.net. He graduated from Tufts University in Boston in 1971 with a major in Modern Literature. A newspaper editor and reporter since his days in Washington, D.C., Juneau, Alaska, Tokyo, Japan and Taipei, Taiwan, he has lived and worked 5 countries and speaks rudimentary French, Japanese and Chinese. He hopes to live for a few more years.
Comments