search
David Bedein

Civil War monuments: when the South reversed the results of the war

There is a lot of confusion as to what all the fuss is about concerning thousands of monuments to Confederate soldiers who fought in the Civil War, 1861-1865.

To most people, this is all a matter of sentimental nostalgia.

Not to the South and not to the people who relish the Confederacy.

Not to the people who were enslaved by the South.

Yet what is missing here is very important element.

The South was defeated in what Dixie always calls the war between the states.

How, then, were  statues and memorials erected to remember the vanquished and not the victorious in that bloody war?

The answer is what occurred in the aftermath of the 1876 Presidential election, with the stalemate in the Electoral College between the Republican Rutherford B. Hayes, and the Democrat Samuel J. Tilden.

The results of that acrimonious fight: A decision by Southern states to throw their support behind Hayes, in exchange for a cancellation of the U.S. program of Reconstruction, a euphemism for UNION military occupation and subjugation of former Confederate States.

Following the Hayes inauguration in 1877, the era of Reconstruction ended.

Former  Confederates  resumed their leadership in  southern states, all of which enacted new legislation which restored  the freed Blacks into quasi-slave status.

Jim Crow laws and a system of strict segregation were established, which would last almost 90 years and which would spread throughout America.

Hence, when  Blacks were conscripted into the US military, separate fighting units were established, a practice that lasted into the 20th  century.

The highest law in the land, the US Supreme Court, ruled in favor of segregation, in the famous Pessy vs. Ferguson decision, in 1896.

That decision was not reversed until the Brown Vs. Board of Education Supreme Court Decision of 1954.

The Confederate statues meant one thing to the South.

They had lost the war on the battlefield, yet they won the war through politics and diplomacy.

Southern Whites took pride in these statues.

Blacks felt saw them as a source of continuing humiliation, especially since the subjugation of Blacks was renewed in 1876.

I was sensitized to this because, 50 years ago in high school in Philadelphia, at Akiba Hebrew Academy, we had a teacher named Dr. Harold Gorvine who ran a seminar for us on the 1876 US presidential elections and the aftermath of Reconstruction.

Dr. Gorvine taught us through role play about American politics at the time.

At the time, I worked for a summer school program in West Philadelphia  for Black children, and  taught the children a chapter in American history which they did not know.

From a glance at current American media, it is not clear that most Americans know about the events  of 1877, which has affected the legacy of America to this day.

About the Author
David Bedein, who grew up in Philadelphia and moved to Israel in 1970 at the age of 20, is an MSW community organizer by profession and an expereinced investigative journalist. In 1987 he established the Israel Resource News Agency, with offices at the Beit Agron Int’l Press Center in Jerusalem, where he also serves as Director of the Center for Near East Policy Research. In 1991, Bedein was the special CNN middle east radio correspondent. Since 2001, Bedein has contributed features to the newspaper Makor Rishon. In 2006, Bedein became the foreign correspondent for the Philadelphia Bulletin, writing 1,062 articles until the newspaper ceased operation in 2010. He is the author of " The Genesis of the Palestinian Authority" and "ROADBLOCK TO PEACE- How the UN Perpetuates the Arab-Israeli Conflict: UNRWA policies reconsidered"and the director and producer of the numerous short films about UNRWA policy which can be located at: http://tinyurl.com/lxc6xvs