Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews

Poland: What to do when an oppressed group’s speech is anti-Semitic?

The answer to the headline’s question is: to acknowledge the oppression and how grave it is and to add that that still doesn’t justify Jews’ hatred.

It is not helpful enough when each side only stands up for its own suffering and victimhood — or worse: competes who was hurt more. Both are right and both were hurt but both sides need to acknowledge the other’s truth and pain too – and not equate the sufferings either.

What we certainly don’t need is to muffle (“deescalate“) the truth, soften it all up and just put a bandage on the old wounds. The truth should be said out-loud, but the truth of both sides.

Ethnic Poles and Polish culture were targeted monstrously by the Nazis and their warped racist outlook. Unlike with the Jews, their goal was not to eradicate Slaves but their culture needed to be destroyed and the Slave to be degraded and enslaved. They too were considered inferior to Aryans.

Unfortunately, anti-Semitism had been virulent before, during and after WW II in Poland. Not for nothing, Nazi-Germany established most of the extermination camps on Polish soil. In the Netherlands it would have been unthinkable. There wasn’t enough Jews’ hatred around to do that.

It is true that Poland had a record number of Gentiles who risked their very lives and that of their families helping and hiding and saving Jews. The enormity of that cannot be overstated.

However, the Polish Heroes do not wipe away Polish hatred of Jews, in thought, action and inaction. They may have partly saved the self-respect and honor of Poles but these Defenders of Jews are mostly questioning why so many did nothing and an indictment of the ones who aided the Nazis.

Modern-day Germany shows that national pride doesn’t come from arguing away a less than perfect past but rather from acknowledging and disavowing what wasn’t that good.

Nazi-Germany did not invent nor import anti-Semitism into Poland. And the very denial of Polish anti-Semitism is anti-Semitic itself. As can be seen in it arousing more anti-Semitism.

Way before WW II, Poland was notoriously known for its anti-Semitism. Apparently, it is not cured of it yet.

Polish politicians vouching for their friendship for “the Jewish nation” (sic) but denying past and present anti-Semitism does not cut it. Neither will publicity seeking Jews and their media who plead for civility. Nor amateurish US diplomats trying to sound “reasonable.”┬áNor looking at other aspects of the Israeli-Polish relationship.

The denial of historic (and present) anti-Semitism goes further than trying to whitewash a stained past. It makes that one calls the persecutors persecuted and vise-versa and it muddles all clear thinking about Jews. Now Poland even wants to engage the Iranian regime in the Middle-East peace process. If Hitler were alive, they would slot him in too?

Dual acknowledgment (of Poles’ suffering and complicity) is not only in this issue appropriate.

  • Japanese soldiers were crueler than the Nazis but now, the Japanese hide their participation in a monstrous regime behind their victimhood of the racist targeting of two of their large cities by US atom bombs.
  • Also the Dutch — until today — hide their passivity about and collaboration with the Nazi occupier by complaining about having been victimized by Hitler, by pointing out the resistance (which was mainly nationalistic, not anti-Nazi, and ignored the plight of its Jews) and highlighting the exceptional number of savers of Jews.

Also in issues not connected to WW II, dual acknowledgment can save the day, for instance regarding abortions. Every human life is worth saving and women must decide for themselves. Recognition of both plights may shift the attention from mutual recriminations to joint efforts for prevention of unwanted pregnancies and adaption programs.

How lovely it would be if both states would not deliver a dual message but just acknowledged each other’s pain. Poland decrying its anti-Semitic past and present and Israel voicing empathy for the ethnic cleansing the Nazis attempted on the Slaves. Win-win if ever there was such a possibility.

Say it loudly and proudly. Nothing else and no beating around the bush anymore.

About the Author
The author is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (DES - Diethylstilbestrol), born in 1953 to two Dutch Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork, and holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam). He taught Re-evaluation Co-counseling, became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a vegan for 8 years now. * His most influential teachers (chronologically) are: his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach and lehavdiel bein chayim lechayim: Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo and Rav Zev Leff. * Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years he wrote hasbara for the Dutch public. His fields of attention now are varied: Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science, Politics (Israel, the US and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight Truth), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, GLBTQAI, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), Ecology and Veganism. Many people can't understand or like him because he has such a wide vision that he never fits any specialist's box. But that exactly what others love about him. Many of his posts relate to affairs from the news or the Torah Portion of the Week or are new insights that suddenly befell him. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, reassure the doubters but make the self-assured doubt more. He strives to bring a fresh perspective rather than bore you with the obvious. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds must be disputed. In short, his main political positions are: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, democracy, anti the fake peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, Science, Free Will, anti blaming-the-victim and for down-to-earth optimism. Read his blog how he attempts to bridge any discrepancies. He admits sometimes exaggerating to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quit a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. November 13, 2018, he published his 500st blog post with the ToI. * He likes doing age-appropriate and age-inappropriate things and looks forward to getting to know his timeless mature out-of-the-box soul mate. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Comments