Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews -- For those who like their news and truths frank and sharp

Sex and Blessing

Where is the part of the Talmud that discusses making a blessing before, during or after sex? Maybe it got lost at burnings of Talmud volumes by our enemies? We may have lost whole Tractates. However, in this case that seems unlikely. It should be among the most copied texts.

More likely would be that this was never recorded, to avoid stimulating thoughts and activities that would interrupt men’s Jewish learning — their highest activity. Going to the bathroom does not interrupt in the same way and is a must; breathing, eating and drinking can be done during learning; but learning and praying must be brought to a halt for sex.

Further, it’s much easier to find kosher consumptions than kosher sex. The latter needs a kosher partner, privacy, and often waiting time (getting married, nidah, the other being interested) and many more conditions that when violated can render it not a halachic success, Heaven forbid. Furthermore, overeating is not so good, but G-d gives us generally many chances to repent; He’s not so patient on sexual immoralities.

So maybe also now, there should be no writing about this, not to make learners abandon their learning? Maybe just have men learn this who normally do not learn Jewish stuff? Yet, this should be mostly learned by the holiest of the holiest people, not to defile sexuality’s holiness.

The Sages teach that sexuality should only be taught to a few at the time, not to lead to wrong learning. So could this text be kosher at all? I believe that this restriction is only for teaching details on intimacy, not about something as distant as blessings about it.

So then why no blessing before, during or after sex?


When it’s time to do a commandment, do it — don’t wait. But we postpone Waving the Lulav by making declarations and a blessing. Even many do that before Counting the Omer, but that is heavily disputed, because why make a declaration on making a declaration? Further, don’t waste time when we need to bless Time. But a blessing is made.

In addition, we may let a lulav wait, but a blessing is for recognizing G-d and He doesn’t really need us, compared to our partner. We don’t make blessings when we are supposed to be cut off from Him (as mourners before the funeral, Heaven forbid) and not when we’re in love with someone else. At that moment, our flesh-and-blood beloved should have priority. Our partner is not a thing that can wait. We also do not invite G-d to the act — He will crash the party and place Himself between the partners at the most holy moment without invitation.

Another question is: blessing before what? Consuming has only two stages: taking in the mouth and swallowing, but sex has many stages: being emotionally close, courting, cuddling, possibly intercourse, possible climaxing.

Also, Jewish sex is not a highly scripted affair. On purpose, the Rabbis let the couple free to work out between them what exactly they want to do for sex. Good luck finding a spot where to insert a blessing.

With food, part of the attention should go to figuring out which of the blessings to make. Rationalizing about a blessing is the last thing that one needs when embarking on sexuality.

We don’t bless before giving charity because executing the commandment depends on two people. The one giving might withhold last minute – the one receiving might not (be able to) collect for whatever reason. We might feel like sex and it still may not happen.

But, we also bless before eating and we might not actually get to drink or eat, so guaranteed success seems not needed for a blessing.

More importantly, we do not want to give recipients of charity the feeling that they are only a nonentity in out fulfillment of a Command, to get our reward and be proper Jews. Rather, we need to show our beneficiaries that we care, that we have them in mind when we give. Similarly, we do not want our partner to get the feeling that we seek intimacy to please G‑d.

A convert after being accepted makes a blessing, not the rabbis who admitted the proselyte, while the commandment to accept new Jews is on them. So which of the two partners in intimacy should bless, or should they both?

But then, there are blessings before: at the wedding ceremony and the Seven Blessings, repeated endlessly in the first week. That should suffice as blessing before.


We don’t interrupt the execution of a commandment to make a blessing. Especially so when we’re not dressed for the occasion.


Blessings should only be made before the act? Well, we bless after use of the bathroom and on having eaten and drunk enough – for gratefulness.

If we should bless afterwards, perhaps best we should only do that after having gone to the ritual bath after intimacy. But after that, we better should focus on learning and praying. Maybe to bless only then is already too late. Or maybe it could be overheard, which would not be good. (The man does make one time a blessing, after the first time – asher yatzar.)

If not done properly, the sex would not feel good, especially not afterwards. If we wolf down food, no blessings are said before or afterwards, and doing so is not even a violation of fasting, as that is not considered eating. There is also no blessing before swallowing bitter medicine, as that is not pleasurable either. So what criterion should tell us if the sex was proper enough to warrant a blessing? Reportedly, many people rush through some acrobatics to get sex over with – that’s not sex and certainly cannot compel a blessing.

Sex is sometimes done in settings, at times or under conditions that make the holy act ill advised or even forbidden, Heaven forefend. Participants then might very well feel regret as soon as it’s over. A blessing then, would erase this important moment of repentance and even enlarge our wickedness and punishment.

Maybe only after success we should bless?


Beforehand we don’t know if there will be “success.” And what kind of success are we talking about: closeness, climaxing, feeling one flesh, intercourse, pregnancy, birth?

Success depends on the commandment. The man has a holy obligation to give his wife sex that is pleasurable to her and a commandment to produce children. The woman is asked to enable her husband to release with her, to prevent him from illicit sex.

But a man should not bless when his wife feels great. She should. But maybe she faked it. It’s also funny to bless on someone else’s activity.

A woman should not bless when her husband accomplished. He should. Maybe he faked it. It’s also funny to bless on someone else’s activity.

It would be terrible if one partner would bless on feeling good while the other is not happy, as sex is, when properly done, an activity of mutual giving and receiving – yet another antidote against selfishness.

But then, after a child is born, there is enough to do and we make blessings at the circumcision. For girls, everything is more hidden anyway.


To remove activity from the purely animalistic level and elevate it to a higher holier plane, we bless before and after foods. And to express our gratefulness for the good feelings and sustenance. Perhaps sex is so holy that it does not need elevation?

In fact, blessings are to bring us closer to G-d. Nothing brings us closer to G‑d than the true receiving and giving of relational sex; no blessing is needed there. And any sex that is not like that, does not deserve a blessing.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe too, here: or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (, born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here:
Related Topics
Related Posts