search
Walter G. Wasser

Think Twice Before Gifting Genetic Testing Kits

Dr. Adina Wise’s thought-provoking piece in Scientific American titled “Genetic Testing Is a Gift. But It Shouldn’t Be a Present” raises critical questions about the ethics and implications of direct-to-consumer genetic testing kits as holiday gifts. Her article recounts the story of Pandora, a patient who experienced both empowerment and familial discord after gifting genetic testing kits to her siblings. Pandora’s tale serves as a cautionary example of how genetic revelations can profoundly impact individuals in unforeseen ways.

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing has become increasingly popular, offering insights into ancestry, health traits, and disease predispositions. These tests, marketed as fun and enlightening, often conceal their potential for delivering unexpected, and sometimes distressing, results. As Dr. Wise illustrates, while Pandora viewed her genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease as a call to action, her brother’s reaction was one of despair. Their divergent responses underscore the deeply personal nature of how individuals process genetic information.

Dr. Wise’s nuanced argument highlights the importance of genetic counseling. As a clinical neurologist, she regularly guides patients through the decision to undergo genetic testing, ensuring they are equipped to understand the limitations and implications of their results. She stresses that such counseling is indispensable for anyone considering genetic testing, let alone gifting it.

Her article also delves into the ethical and psychological complexities of genetic testing. The allure of uncovering one’s genetic makeup is often amplified by holiday marketing campaigns, which equate DNA kits with family bonding and self-discovery. However, as Dr. Wise points out, these tests can lead to revelations about health risks or hidden family secrets that are not always welcome—and sometimes come with life-altering consequences.

The psychological burden of knowing one’s genetic predispositions is not trivial. For example, APOE4, a genetic marker associated with a significantly increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease, can bring immense anxiety to those who learn they carry the mutation. Even James Watson, a co-discoverer of DNA’s structure, chose to redact his APOE4 status when his genome was sequenced.

Dr. Wise’s article concludes with an essential piece of advice: if you are considering gifting a genetic testing kit, think carefully. Engage in open conversations with loved ones about the potential implications, and encourage consultation with genetic counselors before any decisions are made. The true gift lies not in the test itself but in respecting each individual’s freedom to decide when and if to explore their genetic secrets.

As we embrace advancements in personalized medicine and genetic science, we must also navigate the moral and emotional landscapes they create. Dr. Wise’s cautionary tale serves as a reminder that while knowledge can be empowering, it must be approached thoughtfully and responsibly. This holiday season, perhaps it’s best to leave genetic testing kits off the gift list and focus instead on fostering meaningful connections that don’t come with a test tube.

Reference: Adina Wise, “Genetic Testing Is a Gift. But It Shouldn’t Be a Present,” Scientific American, December 19, 2024. Link to article.

About the Author
The author is a specialist in nephrology and internal medicine and lives with his wife and family in Jerusalem.