-
NEW! Get email alerts when this author publishes a new articleYou will receive email alerts from this author. Manage alert preferences on your profile pageYou will no longer receive email alerts from this author. Manage alert preferences on your profile page
- RSS
A New Pro-Israel for Obama’s America
The events of last month were filled with dramatic ups and
downs for young American Jews like myself. First I celebrated the re-
election of Barack Obama, after a campaign during which many of my
friends worked hard on the front lines. Obama’s victory was a triumph
of a diverse coalition, full of young people coming together to support a
more equitable, tolerant, and just future for our generation and for the
country. We had a lot to be proud of. Yet just two short weeks later, the
celebratory atmosphere had not quite worn off when it was suddenly
cut short by events in Israel and Gaza. My friends and I moved quickly
from the elation of the ballot box to the fear, sadness and frustration of
rockets and bombs as the latest escalation put the lives of thousands of
Israelis and Palestinians in danger.
The powerful sense of agency we had felt during the election
evaporated overnight, replaced by a feeling of helplessness – we were
helpless to protect loved ones, helpless to stop the violence and killing,
helpless in the face of the inevitable polarization among friends and on
our campuses. Solidarity in working for change transformed into
solidarity in assigning blame. My Facebook page and Twitter feed filled
up with loud, repetitive, unyielding statements: “I stand with Israel.”
“Stop the killing in Gaza.” “Palestinians aren’t victims – they are
terrorists.” Where just days earlier my social networks were filled with
exhortations to vote and work together for a brighter future, now they
were covered in nationalist slogans, declarations of tribal solidarity, and
celebrations of military might.
These events exemplify a startling and unsustainable tension, between
what the American Jewish community wants for our country, and the
rhetoric we resort to when it comes to Israel. Often, the full-throated
defense of Israel is based around a clash of civilizations narrative, the
assumption that Israel’s enemies are fundamentally and uniformly evil,
incomprehensible, and repugnant. This school of thought posits that
Palestinian civilians are accessories to terrorism and that their suffering
is not comparable to Jewish suffering. It has little time for compassion,
dialogue, or peace-making.
In American politics, this clash of civilizations narrative has drawn
support from neo-conservatives, Christian fundamentalists, and older
white voters. All these groups have seen their influence decline over the
last two presidential elections, and on almost all issues other than Israel
economic policy, women’s and gay rights, immigration reform – these
groups have little in common with young American Jews. How long will
we continue to parrot their foreign policy rhetoric? And do we really
expect our progressive political partners to adopt it, or accept it?
The vast majority of our government and our country support Israel’s
right to exist, defend itself, and flourish. But an important, ascending
part of our electorate do not support the continued occupation of the
West Bank, attitudes of racial or national supremacy, or the collective
demonization of millions of Arabs and Muslims. Nor do they support
endless military conflict in the Middle East, when they know that such
conflict tends to put American troops in harm’s way. They may believe it
when they are repeatedly told that “Israel is the only democracy in the
Middle East,” but they will also hold Israel to that standard – and won’t
issue free passes for a never-ending occupation, anti-democratic
legislation, or racist incitement against Palestinians. They cannot be
expected to have much tolerance for a government whose Interior
Minister advocates bombing a highly-populated area “into the Middle
Ages” or whose Foreign Minister considers human rights groups to be
enemies of the state and supporters of terrorism. Nor will young
American Jews continue to have patience with such attitudes, when they
clash so profoundly with the values and goals – tolerance, diversity,
equality – that we work for on our campuses and in our communities.
Israel must face the reality that its greatest ally is becoming younger,
more diverse, more progressive and more broad-minded in its goals for
itself and for the world. The language and attitudes of the neo-
conservative right are destructive in the ways that they influence Israeli
policy, but they also seriously jeopardize Israel’s American support. For
young American Jews, it is our duty to convey to our Israeli friends and
family the urgent need to avoid a retreat into tribalism and militant
nationalism. The importance of emphasizing and prioritizing
compassion, co-existence, and the pursuit of peace and justice
alongside security. We want a brighter future for the United States and
for Israel;we want our non-Jewish friends and leaders to support Israel
not because they have swallowed talking points but because they
genuinely believe that the country is a force for justice and peace in the
Middle East and the world, despite the many challenges and enemies it
faces. Israel cannot be a cause only for aging conservatives. Instead, it
should become a natural ally for the millions of young people who will
soon lead Obama’s America.
The onus is on Israel’s government to do what it needs to pursue
peace and uphold democracy. But responsibility also falls on American
Jews. We must take the sense of urgency and dedication we have
applied to our domestic politics and put them to use in advocating for
and pursuing a better Israel, and a better Middle East. We cannot get out
the vote in West Philadelphia but say nothing about permanent
disenfranchisement in the West Bank. We cannot speak out for the
rights of Mexican immigrants in Texas but ignore the expulsion of African
refugees in Tel Aviv. We must bring the two communities and countries
we love closer together – or watch as they inevitably drift apart.