search
Aaron Zimmer
Cohost of "Physics to God" podcast

Fine Tuning Is Not Exclusively for Life

What do both sides get wrong about the fine tuning argument? (pikzels)
What do both sides get wrong about the fine tuning argument? (pikzels)

One of the great ironies about the way people discuss the fine-tuning argument for God is that both religious people and multiverse scientists mischaracterize it in the same way! Both groups say that the universe appears fine-tuned for life. While that’s kind of true, it overstates the case and makes for a less compelling argument.

First, let’s start off with what fine-tuning is for. The constants of nature—fixed numbers that determine fundamental quantities in nature, like the mass of an electron—have specific values that allow for the existence of a complex, ordered, and structured universe filled with atoms, molecules, planets, stars, galaxies, and life. If their values were even a bit different, none of those things would exist.

True, without fine-tuning there would be no life, but that’s only because life depends on everything else, like atoms and stars. It’s overstating the case to say the exclusive purpose of all fine-tuning is for life. Life is special, but it’s not the only amazing and wonderful thing in the universe.

Multiverse scientists say fine tuning is for life because they need to explain fine tuning without an intelligent cause. They argue: If there are an infinite number of other unobservable universes with different values for the constants, then it is reasonable to say that we happen to be in a universe that seems fine-tuned for life. This is because an intelligent observer couldn’t exist anywhere else! Multiverse scientists must argue that we live in a typical universe with intelligent observers. Of course, there are serious problems with multiverse theory, but that is a story for another day.

Religious people want to say that fine tuning is for life because then fine tuning can serve as an argument for divine providence. But in saying too much, they threaten to lose the incredibly compelling argument from fine-tuning for the existence of God. In short, the fine-tuning argument can show an intelligent cause exists, but it can’t show divine providence. If you try to grab too much, you’ll end up with nothing at all. And, the most important thing is God.

About the Author
After earning a physics degree and receiving rabbinical ordination from Rabbi Yisroel Chait, Aaron Zimmer utilized his personal resources to trade commodity futures. His approach was deeply rooted in the conceptual frameworks of physics and the Brisker Method for Talmudic analysis. After an eleven-year career marked by success in commodity trading, Aaron now cohosts a podcast, "Physics to God", with Rabbi Dr. Elie Feder. He resides in Lawrence, New York, along with his wife and their five children.
Related Topics
Related Posts