Josef Avesar

Israel and Palestine Are Not a Freak Show

Why the World Must Stop Treating the Conflict as a Spectacle and Demand Normal Standards of Peace

For over a century, the people of Israel and Palestine have endured a cycle of violence so deeply entrenched that many now view it as an unavoidable fact of life—an immovable reality like the sun rising in the east. But this normalization of suffering is not only tragic; it is a profound moral failure by the parties involved and by the international community that enables it.

Despite the staggering- hundreds of thousands of dead, entire generations traumatized, communities shattered—there is no meaningful vision for peace. The same slogans are repeated. The same games are played. The same “solutions” only entrench the divisions further. The region has become, for much of the world, a kind of geopolitical freak show—a slow-motion catastrophe consumed passively on screens, through sound bites, and in periodic surges of outrage.

A Crisis of Standards

At the heart of this enduring conflict lies a crisis of standards. The people of Israel and Palestine—brilliant, resilient, and sophisticated in so many areas—have come to accept astonishingly low expectations from themselves and from their leaders. Israelis have built a global technological powerhouse, a thriving economy, and advanced infrastructure, yet continue to uphold a national identity—a Jewish State—that fundamentally contradicts the democratic values they also claim to embrace.

This contradiction is not academic. It is the source of structural inequality. A state that defines itself primarily by religion or ethnicity cannot be fully democratic to those who are not part of that religious or ethnic group. The insistence on a Jewish state in a land with millions of non-Jews not only makes peace impossible, it enshrines inequality into law and policy. It is not just morally indefensible—it is strategically self-defeating.

Palestinians, on the other hand, have long suffered the consequences of occupation, displacement, and statelessness. But even among their leadership, there is often a lack of visionary alternatives beyond resistance or survival. The failure to break the mold—to demand a genuine alternative framework that includes mutual dignity, equality, and shared governance—means the same destructive patterns are recycled repeatedly.

Where Is the Global Standard for Peace?

Why does the world continue to accept this? Why are the most basic standards of peaceful coexistence—so foundational in countries like the United States—not promoted in Israel and Palestine?

The United States insists on the separation of church and state within its own borders. It enshrines individual rights and freedoms in a constitution. It supports a federal system that balances regional representation with national unity. Yet, in Israel and Palestine, the U.S. promotes frameworks that deepen ethnic and religious division, not resolve it. Why?

Why is the idea of a secular, democratic, federal government in Israel and Palestine—one that treats all its people as equals, Jewish, Muslim, Christian, and others—considered too radical, too idealistic, or simply “unrealistic”? Is it because the global community has internalized the idea that Jews and Muslims cannot live together in equality and peace?

A Glimpse of Prejudice in Plain Sight

There may be darker forces at play. The enduring global obsession with this conflict, the readiness to watch without intervening meaningfully, may reflect deep-seated prejudices—antisemitism and Islamophobia disguised as geopolitical fatalism. The spectacle of Jews and Muslims locked in eternal struggle allows some in the world to indulge a subconscious narrative: that these two peoples are uniquely incapable of peace, that their religions make coexistence impossible, that violence is their default condition.

This is not only false—it is racist. It denies the complexity, humanity, and agency of millions of individuals. It robs them of their potential and excuses the world from holding them—and itself—to higher standards.

The Path Forward: A New Vision

It is time to reject the theater of endless war and demand a dignified, rational alternative. That alternative is a single, federal government for all of Israel and Palestine. A government based on a constitution. A government that separates religion from state. A government that gives every citizen—Jewish, Palestinian, or otherwise—equal rights, equal representation, and equal protection under the law.

This is not a utopian fantasy. It is the very foundation on which many successful democracies stand. Why should the people of Israel and Palestine accept anything less?

They deserve more than a never-ending war of identity. They deserve peace with dignity. And the world must stop watching from the sidelines as if this is entertainment. It’s time to stop treating Israel and Palestine as a freak show—and start demanding real, transformative peace.

About the Author
Josef Avesar is founder of the Israeli Palestinian Confederation, which advocates for a mutual third government for Israelis and Palestinians. An American-Israeli of Iraqi background, he practices law in the U.S., but travels frequently to Israel and Palestine.
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.