The Sages tell us that prayer needs [to be said with] attention. Rattling off the words of old is but a shadow of what Jewish prayer should be. “Prayer without attention is like a body without a soul.” But, attention to what?
-
We should know Who we are talking to
Most people would say, that’s obvious: G^d. Actually, it’s not the full answer. Yes, we surely should speak to our Father, our King. We should talk as we would to a loving, all-powerful, all-understanding father. But also we need to address a classical king who may let his subjects address him but is free to do as he sees fit. But, Jewish Prayer talks to two more.
We should also overhear ourselves. To pray is in Hebrew a reflexive verb. It’s therapy with the best Therapist. We don’t just want a therapist to hear and understand us. (G^d doesn’t need our prayer. He’s not an idol that needs to be placated.) In therapy, we need to listen to and get ourselves.
And, last but not least, when we say the Sh’ma’ and repeat the Standing Prayer, we want other Jews to hear us (Israel, hear!) and agree (Amen!).
Prayer is us talking to G^d. The Torah reading is G^d talking to us. And Jewish learning is us having a dialogue with G^d.
-
We should know what we are saying
To understand the set words. Israelis who understand Hebrew think that we should mean what we are saying. For non-Hebrew speakers, it’s OK to use a proper (not a too free) translation of the original in a language that they understand. But, surprisingly, it is also kosher prayer when we say it in the Holy Tongue if we don’t know Hebrew because the Language that G^d created the world with is so Holy that it will reach our Soul anyway.
-
We should choose constantly to be with it
To pay attention. Not to rattle off the words on the automatic pilot. To slow down may help. Not to just sing them and go with the flow (of the notes). Israelis – who easily understand the Hebrew – often take prayer with attention to mean, not to rush through the words as a typewriter.
-
We should notice how we feel about our prayer
We are not supposed to read the prayer emotionless, as if it doesn’t concern us. We should reflect on what feelings these words give us when we mean them.
-
We should contemplate the implications of what we pray for
When we grant that wind and rain come from G^d, we accept His Kingship. When we ask for beneficial rain, we show that nothing is a given or to be taken for granted and that G^d is also our merciful Father in Heaven.
-
We should know why we are praying
As I mentioned above, G^d doesn’t need our prayer. He wants our prayer but for our good only. Our prayer texts sometimes show us how we should feel, talk or act. Sometimes, they tell us not to take things for granted by letting us ask and thank (not because He wouldn’t know our needs). Not to just think about ourselves but pray for everyone’s well-being. G^d gives us a chance to partner with Him in what He does or at least to have our say considered before something would happen that we don’t want to occur (Please, heal). And our prayers constantly remind us that G^d is leading the world to perfection as we speak and that despair is always misplaced.
-
Our prayer should be fresh
We should say the prayer as if we never said it before. (This actually is true for that moment. Children don’t pretend that every day is a new one. It actually is.) We should be surprised and spontaneous in saying our prayers. We should insert our own thoughts and words that come from the heart. There never was and there never will be a prayer like this.
In daily life, it is generally not good to complain. “You think you have it bad — I’ll show you,” may the Satan respond. But saying how good we have it is a mostly good thing (if we note that we don’t necessarily deserve so much goodness but are grateful for it). Then, the Satan may reply, “You think this is good — I’ll show you what is good.” But in prayer, it is excellent to pour out our hearts. To say it as it comes. Our unpolished feelings are expected.
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. *
As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. *
This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe too, here: https://mmvanzuiden.wordpress.com/ or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. *
Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. *
Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. *
Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. *
He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. *
He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (https://diethylstilbestrol.co.uk/studies/des-and-psychological-health/), born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. *
He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. *
His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. *
To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. *
His newest books you may find here: https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AMoshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&s=relevancerank&text=Moshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1