Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews -- For those who like their news and truths frank and sharp

Making America Alienate Again. Trump’s flip-flop and back-again on fascism

After 48 hours, US President Donald J. Trump finally condemned the white supremacists who held a murderous really two days before. At first, he condemned “violence on many sides … on many sides” as if the counter-demonstrators had been a problem to him too. His final statement was fine in that he actually named the groups he denounced and his denunciation was in no uncertain terms. A couple of things about that though don’t sit well with me.

Firstly, his second statement was too late, but as such it was fine, wasn’t it? Yet, he was hardly praised for it. His critics, so quick and numerous to condemn his first (half-hearted) statement – and rightly so – could not find the decency and good sportsmanship to praise him for the repair of his earlier flunking. How constructive is your criticism if, even when it’s heeded, you keep harping on how you had to protest? You were right and you were vindicated. Stop the criticism for the sake of criticism. If you want people to listen to your protests, you better approve of them once they agree with you. Or is all anti-Trump speech only there to discredit him? (Does he need the help?)

Or is there a deeper reason for people still not being pleased?

Secondly, something still was off in the wording of the second declaration. Did you notice too? At least subconsciously, people seem to pick up on it. Let me try to pinpoint where he still went wrong.

1. When Mr. Trump normally speaks, he uses mainly one-syllable and two-syllable words in simple sentences. Powerful commercials. He could say something like: He is a bad person; very bad. Total looser.

But when he read his second statement, it sounded not like him at all. Someone else had written the text and he had not trumpized it! Suddenly he’s “presidential.” That makes his words sound hollow.

It is a problem to sound authentic when putting down Diet Coke but insincere when criticizing racism. In contrast, his “[violence] on many sides … on many sides” seemed an off-the-cuff authentic addition. He never apologized for his initial moral equivalence, which was so off.

Not only that. He used words that some of them I had to look up. (I didn’t even know that he could read and pronounce such words.) Look at them. I checked them in the Collins Cobuild English Dictionary (1995) for frequency. It rates how common or uncommon entries are.

  • Bigotry – 1 out of 5 – very rare word – “very strong discrimination”
  • Supremacists – 0 out of 5 – uncountably rare – “extreme racists”
  • Egregious – 0 out of 5 – uncountably rare – “very bad indeed”
  • Repugnant – 0 out of 5 – uncountably rare – “horrible, disgusting”

Using such words, he imples: My regular voters, you don’t know these words; neither do I. They made me say them but you can disregard them. You know that when I really dislike someone I call them “bad bad people.” So just ignore the bookish language. It’s not me.

2. He used fake words like: “We must rediscover the bonds of love and loyalty that bring us together as Americans.” My question: Who must rediscover that? Racists. But one doesn’t speak to racists like that! He should have said: Racists must learn that in America bonds of love and loyalty bring all people together. That’s what he should have said.

3. More poorly chosen words: “Heather Heyer, was tragically killed.” No, she was not. She was brutally murdered for standing up against Nazism. This was not a tragedy – this is bravery in the face of evil, and an outrage.

4. He first had to brag three paragraphs about his economic policies before denouncing Neo-Nazism. That is such a lack of respect for the issue, although it might have been set up like that to portray himself as a great rather than an embattled leader, being pressured to shape up.

5. In his first statement he told us that we “must cherish our history together.” Wasn’t that just what the demonstration was all about: not to trash historical leaders for having been for slavery? In his second statement, he never corrected that point (see below: Thirdly).

6. His called these fascists “thugs and criminals.” That is misplaced. Calling people names doesn’t help. It also doesn’t help to pretend that they are violating laws (“criminals”) by voicing their hateful philosophy – they are not. In Germany they would be. He took the wind out of this statement by reading from paper that they are despicable.

7. He didn’t call them Nazi terrorists. That looks extra-bad from a man stalking his predecessor for not calling Muslim extremism: terrorism. Mr. Obama at least had the redeeming factor that he didn’t want to taint underdogs in the US: Muslims. Is Trump sparing fascists?

8. He condemned White supremacists, the KKK and Neo-Nazis, but NOT: Alt-Right and White Nationalists; he’s close friends among them.

Thirdly, it ain’t over ’til it’s over. At the next press conference after this, he called counter demonstrators (“the Alt-Left”) “also very violent.” Unbelievably, he said too that there were very fine innocent people that were there to demonstrate against the taking down of the statue of the pro-slavery Lee. And George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were major slave owners. Are you now going to take them down too?

Well, in truth, “innocents,” whose demonstration were high-jacked by weapons-and-flags-carrying fascists from all over the country, should have left immediately. By marching together with fascists they became fascists by association and stopped being innocent.

It makes a crucial difference to be a slave owner at a time that all wealthy people were and when due to violently oppose its abolishing.

It’s hard to keep up with the news without a blow-by-blow overview.

In conclusion, he totally undid the second correcting statement!

And… he’s still surrounded by Alt-Right White-Nationalist racists. Also, about his record, he never apologized (does he know the word?) for: his constant racist attacks on President Obama, his stream of sexist assaults on Secretary of State Clinton, energizing the extreme Right.

Hilary Clinton, like so many politicians, often sounds insincere and arrogant, but when she talks about racism and sexism she knows the subjects. She doesn’t need to read statements from a teleprompter to discuss Triple oppression. President Trump still has no clue, as about many things besides twittering and trying to make money on the fly.

And that’s not because it’s impossible to do or say the right thing here.

Like when on Holocaust Memorial Day he failed to name the Jews.

Am I reading too much into the president’s words? No, I don’t think so. The second declaration was not just off-the-cuff remarks. It was written over 45 hours. It should have been perfect. Any imperfection may be telling. And that’s what people react to, with or without aware analysis. And then, to add insult to injury, he undid his carefully scripted unauthentic corrections in the next press conference.

For weeks on end, the Trump presidency is scandalized by leaks from the White House. This week, the president did it all by himself. His political diaper (he’s a novice in politics) leaked so much that he got everyone p***ed who is not a total idiot on fascism. However, …

I would not call Mr. Trump a racist. Rather, he’s a total idiot on racism. That comes close but is not quite the same thing. I don’t know if many people will make the subtle difference, though. And he’s bad friends.

Is there anyone who still thinks that he’s redeemable? Many Republicans seem to ponder not if but when to drop him.

Last but not least, don’t forget that all highly inflammable talk is meant to obscure Trump’s daily executive orders to roll back all of Obama.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, an almost daily blog contributor to the Times of Israel, and previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is (partly) generated by AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. He doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit about what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and education contribute to his visions. * If you don't know the Dutch, get an American peek behind the scenes here: * To find less-recent posts on subject XXX among his 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe, here: * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. Yet, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people who don't deserve that. He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust, and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * His most influential teachers (chronologically) are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. * One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. He loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, anti-elitism, anti-bigotry and supremacy, for Zionism, Intersectionality, and non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (, born in 1953 to parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, empowering therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids non-violently. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's being a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. He lives with his library in Jerusalem. Feel free to contact him. * His writing has been made possible by a (second-generation) Holocaust survivors' allowance from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here:
Related Topics
Related Posts