David Lemmer

Matot: Vows, Contingencies, and Faith

Vows, faith, hope - Grok XAI
Vows, faith, hope - Grok XAI

At the outset of Parshat Matos-Masei, the Torah outlines the laws governing vows and oaths, stating in Bamidbar 30:2, “Whatever comes out of his mouth, he shall do.” Later, in the narrative of the tribes of Reuven and Gad requesting the land of Gilead, Moshe echoes this principle in Bamidbar 32:24, saying, “What has come out of your mouths, you must do.” This clear connection between the parsha’s opening and its conclusion reveals a deliberate structure: the laws of vows set the stage for the story of Reuven and Gad, whose binding commitment to their promise shapes their destiny. Once the Torah establishes the intricacies of making and upholding oaths, the sons of Reuven and Gad can craft a plan that is both binding and enduring.

 

Yet, a question arises: could Reuven and Gad nullify their agreement with the rest of the nation, much like an individual who vows to abstain from food can seek annulment from a rabbi or three laypeople? Moshe makes it clear that failing to honor their promise would cost them dearly. They would forfeit the fertile lands east of the Jordan River and instead receive their portion in the land of Israel alongside the other tribes. This consequence would not only thwart their own desires but also harm the broader nation, as accommodating two additional tribes in the land of Israel would strain resources and space.

 

While the parsha’s two sections are interconnected, they are not identical. The first addresses personal vows, which carry severe consequences for violation, as described in Shabbos 32b, including tragic outcomes like the loss of young family members. In contrast, the agreement with Reuven and Gad is a contingency—a conditional arrangement. Breaking such an agreement seems to revert things to the status quo rather than invoking the same dire punishments. However, Moshe warns in Bamidbar 32:23, “If you do not do this, you will have sinned against Hashem, and know that your sin will find you.” What sin is he referring to, if a contingency can technically be voided? And why emphasize keeping their word if the consequences seem less severe?

 

The “sin” Moshe speaks of lies not merely in breaking the agreement but in the intentions behind it. The consequences of reneging on a contingency are not just logistical—they strike at the heart of the nation’s morale. When Reuven and Gad pledged to lead Israel into battle, affirming their devotion to Hashem, their words inspired hope and unity. If they were to backtrack, the impact would extend beyond losing their desired land. It would demoralize the nation, potentially weakening their faith and resolve in the face of formidable enemies. The ripple effects of their decision could undermine the collective courage of Israel, leaving a lasting wound.

 

Unlike personal vows, which aim to strengthen relationships with God, oneself, or others, a contingency carries greater risk and responsibility. A vow is a commitment to self-improvement or devotion, binding us to elevate our connections—whether to God, people, or even material things like food. It’s a promise to grow, to forge a stronger bond with the present as a bridge to the future. A contingency, however, seeks to transform reality itself. It involves multiple variables, weighing risks against rewards, and demands a clear-eyed assessment of one’s deepest intentions. The question becomes: What are we truly willing to sacrifice, and is the potential payoff worth the battle?

 

A vow is an obligation; a contingency is a dedication. Moshe does not specify a punishment for Reuven and Gad’s failure, only that they would revert to their original inheritance. Yet, he underscores the gravity of their “sin”—the shame of knowing their actions could dampen the nation’s faith. This burden, heavier than any punishment, would linger for generations, as they witness the erosion of Israel’s spiritual strength.

 

Both vows and contingencies demand fidelity, each for distinct reasons. Our commitments, whether personal oaths or collective agreements, carry weight far beyond ourselves. A vow strengthens bonds; a contingency dares to reshape the future. When we make promises, we plant seeds of hope. When we follow through, we cultivate faith—in ourselves, in others, and in Hashem. Every action we take, every word we honor, ripples through time, shaping not only our lives but the destiny of those around us. The world depends on our resolve to act on our words, to pursue our dreams relentlessly, and to remain steadfast in our commitments. For in keeping our word, we prove we can trust ourselves—and in doing so, we inspire faith in others.

 

David Lemmer can be reached at LemmerHypnotherapy.com

About the Author
David Lemmer, is a hypnotherapist based out of Lakewood NJ. He has a couple of books relating to hypnotherapy of a journey through the body and soul of the person to discover their inner meaning. Another book with a beautiful poetic translation of all of Tehillim.
Comments
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.