Our greatest classical music is commonly destroyed by expert misinterpretation
How classical music stayed an elitist affair
I’m not a music authority by any stretch of meaning or imagination, but I know what I like and what I find boring.
I want to clarify that I don’t mean that such musicians can’t play well. I mean that they somehow ruin this kind of music.
As for how music should be played, the story goes that once, Tchaikovsky traveled by boat, and during the long journey, people got bored. There was a piano on board, and someone asked who could play. Tchaikovsky suggested he could play Tchaikovsky. They let him. No one recognized him. But after some works, he was stopped by a high-society lady who said, ‘My dear chap, you have absolutely no understanding of Tchaikovsky.’
In any case, I first discovered Tchaikovsky. I was maybe 10, and I enjoyed the drama. Overture 1812 on a 78-rounds-per-minute disc. Later, I found Le Sacre du Printemps (Stravinsky) and loved it. Same idea.
Mozart
I always avoided Mozart since it was boring. Until, after many years, I discovered Mozart played on period instruments. And I love it. In those small ensembles, everyone worked like crazy to get the music out. But when 20 violinists play the same notes that also they know by heart, their thoughts drift off, and Mozart’s happiness drowns in a sad routine.
‘All great composers go to Heaven; Mozart came from Heaven.’
Yes, I have heard purist, original-instrument renditions that were no pleasure to listen to. Just as Woke, DEI, and feminism can go overboard, when principles in art get too thick, artistry and beauty die too.
Then I found Haydn on period instruments—such beautiful harmonies.
Glenn Gould made me discover the complicated beauty of Bach. But don’t have him play Mozart. Terrible! No joy at all.
Van Beethoven
I’ve heard (the start of) hundreds of performances of Van Beethoven. ‘Boredom put to music.’ I’d rather listen to a dripping tap. All my friends admired him. My father had a huge collection of Van Beethoven records.
How can this be? I once found a Van Beethoven piece for horn and piano that I liked. ‘No wonder,’ said my CD seller, ‘it’s a young Beethoven, still very close to Mozart.’ All these famous musicians filling packed concert halls with endless variations to the sound of monotony. The Netherlands’ prime stand-up comedian of all time (Wim Kan) said, ‘I always get tears in my eyes from Beethoven. Not the only German that made me cry.’ Until …
I just discovered Sir András Schiff playing Van Beethoven. Playful. Nothing rowdy or bombastic. Heavenly. Music. So, that is how it should be played!
Carlebach
Yes, I love (only?) happy music. One of the reasons I love Carlebach. But Carlebach performed by others is almost always killed. They often hum his songs as elevator music or lullabies, put a beat under it to give it volume, and no joy or intensity is left. I once was at a British synagogue where they sang Carlebach with pleasing four-part harmonies as church hymns—beautiful but not Carlebach. Thank G^d, a lot of Reb Shlomo’s original performances are around on the Internet—by the hundreds.
Yes, some people wouldn’t like happy music at all. I once had a sweet friend who was chronically very depressed and then got a deadly cancer. He was 20! I asked him for happy memories or fantasies. He had one, the stillness of a graveyard. But most people could appreciate happy beauty.
Fit for the Masses
The masses think classical music is ‘heavy’ and ‘difficult,’ but they have never heard it played as it should be performed. Don’t reduce the greatest works to background melodies to hum. Make them shine. ‘When the restaurant is good, people will come.’ Get the masses to the concert halls. Get the boredom out of the best music and give it back to everyone!
Of course, there are many more great composers and artists, but let’s first bring some of the greatest ever to most people who deserve them too.
● Mozart: on period instruments
● Haydn: on period instruments
● Bach: by Glenn Gould
● Van Beethoven: by András Schiff
● Carlebach: by himself
—
You may find more controversial writings on Amazon or my own blog.
About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. *
As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. *
This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe too, here: https://mmvanzuiden.wordpress.com/ or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. *
Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. *
Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. *
Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. *
He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. *
He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (https://diethylstilbestrol.co.uk/studies/des-and-psychological-health/), born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. *
He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. *
His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. *
To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. *
His newest books you may find here: https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AMoshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&s=relevancerank&text=Moshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1