Parshah through the Lens of a Mediator: Vayeshev

Joseph’s Dreams and Family Conflict

In this week’s Parsha, Vayeshev, to be read on December 21, 2024 (20th of Kislev, 5785), Jacob will settle in Hebron with his twelve sons.  Joseph relates to his brothers that he had two dreams foretelling that Joseph is destined to rule over the others. Joseph’s brothers had already grown to resent and be jealous of Joseph’s favoritism.  Joseph’s choice to articulate his dreams without considering their impact on his brothers exacerbated the conflict. His brothers’ emotional response led to plotting, first to kill him, and ultimately to sell him into slavery. It is a powerful example of how unchecked communication and unresolved feelings can escalate into destructive actions.

What Could a Mediator have Done?

• Establish Ground Rules for Communication. A mediator could have created a safe space for dialogue, setting ground rules to ensure respectful communication. For instance, Joseph’s brothers might have been encouraged to express their feelings without personal attacks, and Joseph might have been guided to share his dreams in a way that invited curiosity rather than defensiveness.
• Identify Underlying Interests. Beneath the brothers’ anger lies a deeper need for recognition and fairness. They felt overshadowed by Joseph and undervalued by their father, Jacob. A mediator could have helped uncover these underlying interests, shifting the focus from the surface issue of Joseph’s dreams to the broader family dynamics.
• Encouraging Empathy. A skilled mediator could have facilitated a process where the brothers and Joseph saw each other’s perspectives. For example, Joseph might have recognized how his favored status and sharing of dreams intensified his brothers’ insecurities. In a one-on-one session, a mediator could have directly explained how Joseph’s actions towards his brothers are hurtful, and to explain their side to provide better understanding.  Conversely, the brothers could have considered how their hostility might have alienated Joseph further. Was it Joseph’s fault that their father openly favored him?  Were they taking their disappointment in Jacob out on Joseph?
• Crafting a Collaborative Solution. Finally, given the hope for a future relationship, the mediator could have guided the family toward a collaborative resolution. This might have included commitments to equitable treatment among siblings, open communication channels, and collective problem-solving for family issues. Some specific examples include (a) bringing Jacob into the fold to discuss how his feelings towards his sons has strained their relationship, (b) creating a respectful space for the brothers to openly discuss their interests and needs, and (c) developing trust among the brothers to use each of their abilities to benefit one another, instead of resenting the others abilities, or lack thereof.

Lessons for Modern Disputes

The story of Joseph and his brothers reminds us that many disputes stem from unmet emotional needs and miscommunication. A mediator’s role is not to take sides but to create an environment where parties feel heard and empowered to resolve their differences. By fostering empathy, uncovering underlying interests, and promoting constructive dialogue, mediators can transform even deeply entrenched conflicts into opportunities for understanding and reconciliation.

As we reflect on Parshah Vayeshev, let’s take to heart the importance of mindful communication and the power of mediation. Whether in ancient times or today, the tools of a mediator can build bridges where division once stood.

—

Each week, Ari Sliffman, a Jewish legal mediator in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania will discuss the week’s Parshah “through the lens of a mediator.”  Ari will focus on one or two sections of the Parshah and discuss how a mediator could have assisted with the relevant conflict.