search
Dalia M. Cohen
Editor

Should the Reliability of Wikipedia Be Questioned for the Jewish Community?

As one of the world’s most visited websites, Wikipedia has long been a vital resource for easy access to accurate information, and as an encyclopaedia, it has a special significance in the Jewish world. Wikipedia Hebrew is an important part of digital culture in Israel. The fact that Wikipedia also works in Ladino and Yiddish is an additional positive aspect for us. Topics such as current events, historical debates or cultural heritage are approached on this platform from different perspectives. Especially in Israel’s dynamic social structure, where different views often clash, every user can contribute his or her own perspective. This transforms Wikipedia from a mere source of information into an active forum for discussion and exchange. Naturally, Wikipedia’s founder, Jimmy Wales, is a highly respected figure in Israel, as he is around the world. His deep connection to Jewish heritage and culture elevates him beyond being a mere internet entrepreneur. Recognized as an important figure in Jewish communities, Wales also plays an active role in organizations such as the Foundation for Jewish Heritage. His contributions are vital in furthering the missions of such organizations. However, the neutrality of Wikipedia’s content is often the subject of debate.

As a platform for democratizing access to and sharing of information, Wikipedia enables millions of users worldwide to contribute. However, this broad participation is governed by a set of principles and rules. Individuals who wish to create a page or add content to an existing page on Wikipedia must first adhere to the platform’s editorial policies, which are based on neutrality, verifiability, and the use of reliable sources. This ensures that Wikipedia remains a source of information free from vandalism and with assured accuracy. While Wikipedia’s large contributor base makes it a rich source of information, its open structure can sometimes lead to misuse of content and the spread of biased information. To prevent such negative occurrences, Wikipedia has developed a set of strict rules and policies. To maintain the platform’s principle of neutrality, contributors must base their information on verifiable and reliable sources. In addition, editors and administrators continually review content so that biased or misleading information can be quickly identified and corrected.

Earl Washburn, Wikipedia administrator

The open and participatory nature of Wikipedia often leads to the perception that anyone can create a page on the platform. To better understand this perception and how Wikipedia works, we spoke to Earl Washburn, a dedicated and passionate administrator of the platform. Washburn confirmed that this common perception is largely true. “Any user with ‘autoconfirmed’ status can create a new article on Wikipedia,” he said, explaining that to achieve this status, a user’s account must be active for four days and have made at least ten edits. During the interview, I also asked what it means to be an administrator on Wikipedia. Washburn emphasized that being an administrator is entirely voluntary and definitely not a paid job. “Paying someone to edit on Wikipedia violates the site’s neutrality rules,” he noted, once again emphasizing the importance of Wikipedia’s neutrality principle. Washburn mentioned that administrators have certain special privileges on the site, such as the ability to ban users and lock pages that have been vandalized. These privileges are designed to maintain the order and reliability of the Wikipedia community. Washburn, who has been an administrator on Wikipedia since 2004, said he was determined to continue in the role. Despite his successful career, he described contributing to Wikipedia as a hobby. “One of the best things about Wikipedia is that there’s no pressure to edit. You can contribute whenever you want or take a break. That’s why I contribute freely,” he said, emphasizing the importance of the volunteer spirit on the platform. I have a deep respect for the people who make knowledge accessible; their passion and dedication are among the key factors that help maintain Wikipedia’s reliability and neutrality.

In conclusion, Wikipedia is not only a source of information for the Jewish world and Israel, but also an important tool for preserving and passing on cultural and historical heritage to future generations. The growing content related to Jewish languages and culture further enhances the value of this platform for Jewish communities. Jewish communities in Israel and the Diaspora can see Wikipedia not only as an encyclopaedia of information, but also as a reflection of their identity and history. Under Jimmy Wales’ leadership, Wikipedia is playing a critical role in democratizing global knowledge about Judaism and Israel, and contributing significantly to the preservation of this valuable heritage. Wales’ commitment to Jewish heritage and his active work in this area demonstrate how Wikipedia can play a critical role not only in providing access to information, but also in preserving cultural values. This suggests that Wikipedia will continue to be an indispensable resource for Israel and the Jewish world for many years to come.

About the Author
Dalia Cohen has worked in magazines such as Newsweek, Fortune and TechCrunch in her editorial career. She is actively involved in many NGOs and writes articles on topics such as politics, technology and business. She is also actively working on antisemitism and women's rights.
Related Topics
Related Posts