Smallest Bang: A Sequential Male-Development Baseline

Parallel Parsing Torat-Moshe from Biological ‘TWO-initially’ (בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית), rather than Cosmological ‘At-beginning’ → ‘reveals’ modestly expressed strict-sequential life-analogous descriptions: familiar & accessible when Internally-Experienced vicariously; wherein Names (people & places) are ‘clinical/attribute’ Descriptions, while numbers & units convey ‘perceptual/emotional’ Significance Aspects. Background/Introduction: https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/biggest-bang-post-modern-torat-moshe-creation-model/ 

Egalitarian Sustainability Notice

All Women: Free Entrance -albeit- Men: PG-40 – ‘Restricted’

WARNING: MPAA film rating notation PG → Has Been Modified ⇒ To Put Under Age 40 – Jewish Men – On Notice: Should you be Disturbed by any instant or developing element herein, THEN It Is Imperative that the sparks of Our Ancestors and/or Your concerned Guardian ‘Wife’ direct Your eyes from This Text, And direct Your hands To Close This “Book” → Your having already contemplated more than you can Presently understand! ⇒ Not unlike when an accompanying Parent, seeing their child Disturbed by some cinematic element, may Most-Wisely elect to ‘SACRIFICE’ the Price of admission, and EXIT the theater → Accompanied by said child.

Pragmatic prerequisites for entering our initial-adult vantage include appreciating & actualizing ‘Best Life Practices Advice’ enhanced Mitzvot (Halacha from traditional External holistically analyzed & commentary resolved Torat-Moshe) -and- (if male) having completed a preponderance of maturation life-cycle events: including marriage, progressive marital harmony, and multi-progeny parenting → thus allowing one to recognise selected Torat-Moshe fragments as a male-developmental baseline pseudo-Diary (template) of one-person; often expressing (or alluding to) more detail than our deep-memories of similar personal episodes.

Hereinafter begins my comment-sparse translation of the first four ‘DAYS’ – trying to parallel the ultra-terse Torat-Moshe language – while extracting substantially equivalent aspects from Human embryology. Being in no way capable of ‘capturing’ most proper physiological detail – a Medically Qualified Professional summarized: “The first six WEEKS of cellular differentiation in the human zygote are characterized by rapid cell division & specialization, culminating in the formation of distinct tissues & organs. During this period, the zygote undergoes cleavage, gastrulation, and early organogenesis.”

Now – Practical Advice for the Reader: While slowly contemplating each clause of my quasi-parallel ‘biological’ word-for-word transcription → ‘consult’ any-of-many clinical descriptions (appreciating such texts use various differing time-interval measurement to count from conception) -and- validate-compare with the ‘authentic’ Hebrew (and ‘standard-traditional’ English – if necessary) .

Notation: >Bereshis< (chapter.sentence)

(1.1) TWO-initially [2→1]:Conceive (You: a something-from-nothings person-world) ‘Naturally’; of exemplary – Above the visual horizon (Mind) and of exemplary Infrastructure thereto. (1.2) And that infrastructure as-it-was recursively formless of sensory-null threshold; and holographic forces of Nature pause for the maternal-environment response. (1.3) As-IF Nature dictates “Ignite spark-of-life to-be!”; to wit Nature fairly responds with that spark. (1.4) Thus Naturally: an exemplary metastable entropy gradient; meandering among semi-metabolic processes. (1.5) Which to-it naturally “feels” like an illuminated day and a quiesced night; (although actually cellular differentiation of) ONE WEEK. (1.6) Articulates Nature “A sac of enclosure to-be” insulating between the cell-cluster and their maternal. (1.7) So subsequently is a formation generating that very robust membrane of separation (an amniotic-sac environment); just so. (1.8) Which to-it naturally as-if The Heavenly expanse, to wit a day and night (although actually) A SECOND WEEK. (1.9) Naturally the gradient shapes into distinct inner-liquid cellular-tube beneath Mind-space; just so. (1.10) Which to-it naturally as-if an infrastructure of the neuro-circulatory fluid; seemingly viable-sustainable. (1.11) Then can cellular infrastructure differentiate into replicating smooth, striated, and branching cells; just so. (1.12) And infrastructure flourishes accordingly with replicating smooth, striated, and branching cells; just so. (1.13) to wit a day and night (although actually) A THIRD WEEK. (1.14) Behold: an enlightening neurological structure within the cellular-tube Mind-space having differential time-delay aspects; layering to resolve high, diurnal, and ultra-low frequency rhythms. (1.15) As they were eye-centers in the above visual horizon Mind-space responsive to regulate the infrastructure; just so. (1.16) Activated, said neurological structure divided into two distinct albeit integrated masses; a larger brain for “control” during waking active days and a smaller brain for autonomic nights, and “countless” end-points – sparsely distributed throughout the infrastructure. (1.17) Thus, these neurological structures (at this stage of development) comprise the “awareness” interface between a new membrane of separation (the blood-brain encapsulation); to enliven the infrastructure. (1.18) And to refine those differential time delay aspects; thus activating those frequencies into self-regulating biorhythms. (1.19) to wit a day and night (although actually) A FOURTH WEEK.

While cellular differentiation continues for 6-weeks (42-days) – corresponding to 6-creation days of Torat-Moshe → the Zohar designates: gender is determined at 40-days -ALSO- immediately preceding completing these 6-days (6-weeks) ⇒ 10-instantiations (listed in Pirkei Avot 5.6) relate to emerging physiological functions, neurological foci, and developmental events; B”H to be elaborated elsewhere. 

-Jumping to (2.10)- By 7-weeks, even a ‘Late Bronze Age’ Egyptian anatomist recognises a human form ‘Adam the-First’ (about 8mm ‘tall’) → now sentient & conscious, the embryo begins awareness discovery along its own (Eden) centerline: from Tree of Knowledge (top) to the four rivers which water & refresh sensory organs: eyes-tears, ears-cerumen, nose-mucus, and mouth-saliva; (continuing downward) discovering then contemplating surprising thorax asymmetry (calling smaller organs unto left-rib boundary ‘female’ -and- relatively enormous liver-filling right-side ‘male’); then confronting a most subtle creature (not snake – rather umbilical chord) requiring imprinting the First Survival Instinct (to keep it under foot >!< rather than risk choking – enwrapping the neck) – all the while contemplating tactile dead-skin ‘clothing’ (a body out-of-body differentials!); eventually (at bottom) the Tree of Life (genitalia – the far-future gateway to immortality). (3.21)

Transformational KEYS: Regarding numbers of years (in Parshat Bereshis) – since Tehillim/Psalms (90.4) portrays an external day as a thousand years, internally the embryo/fetus perceives the inverse – thus (for example) Adam the-First’s 930-year longevity is clinically 930/1000 parts of a day (22.32 Hours) ⇒ since embryo/fetus parts are ‘maturing’ simultaneously, many such durations are progressing independently and/or with mutual dependencies; while People & Place Names must be parsed to decipher clinical aspects of prenatal neuro-associative areas regarding verbal & nonverbal intelligence, aptitudes, sensitivities, emotions, etc.; THUS the concept ‘Death’ relates to subsequent inability to return to some consciousness orientation – while the expression ‘having sons and/or daughters’ relates to expanding neuro-plasticity regions, neuro-sensory associative areas, etc. Do the numerous prenatal references to ‘male and/or female’ correspond to pre-sympathetic & pre-parasympathetic neural aspects (?); maybe! Trying to Re-Live partial-psychological embryo/fetus attitude ‘macro-aspects’ → and many later orientations are occasionally accessible ℅  https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/personalizing-tzimtzum-tikun-olam-and-tefillah/

Now, however peculiar it is to empathetically experience embryo/fetus awareness/consciousness development, a rebirthing memory/experience is somewhat ‘cloudy’ since there is/was an indeterminate interval between maternal fetal-blood reoxygenation (via umbilical cord), and reoxygenation via new-born’s breathing; thus substantial fetal brain-fog (from maternal hormones) virtually induces time-sensation dilating fetal-hibernation (hence subsequent ‘drunkenness’ and long post-birth deep-sleep intervals). 

Clinically/Linguistically: (5.29) ‘Noah’ is Rest, (6.9) ‘Shem’ is a Language-centric pre-birth-mind, ‘Ham’ is a cardiovascular pre-birth infrastructure-body (consciousness), ‘Japheth’ is a non-linguistic-centric pre-birth-mind (substantially equal but different from the ‘Shem’ side); the ark is the birthing body – detaching in a Flood from the placenta & womb after-birth mass; ark dimensions internally feel like cubits (albeit externally correspond to finger-breadths); the illuminating apex gem/window (6.16) relates to the cranium fontanelles (unformed cranial-sutures’ soft spots); (8.21) the mother’s sweet smell; (9.16) the ‘bow’ in the heavens is the actively changing lines on the new-born’s forehead – indicating to the Mid-wife: the brain is alive (was not oxygen deprived during the birthing) – thus this new person (world) was not destroyed; (9.22) Ham seeing ‘his father’s nakedness’ euphemistically expresses: the ‘cardiovascular pre-birth infrastructure-body’ saw-felt the mother’s birth canal – while the linguistic-centric & non-linguistic-centric pre-birth-minds were deeply ‘hibernating’ ⇒ thereby degrading infrastructure-body (in perpetuity) as subservient-slave to the co-minds (linguistic & non-linguistic)! 

Clinically, ‘attribute’ Avrum is The (Primal) infant Cry – then (11.27 →17.5) his external week interval [to instantly becoming Avruhum – by circumcision] feels much longer for the ‘inexperienced’ newborn.

(12.1) “as if the mind would articulate to the father of all subsequent states:  leave the infrastructure (the womb), and the place of your birth (the birthcanal) and the house of your father (your mother’s private place) & go to a life-infrastructure that you will perceive…” Responding to the first pangs of hunger (12.10) to return to the physical side of the mother ‘Mitzraim’ (12.15) the mother’s feminine aura ‘Pharaoh’ ⇒ (12.16) ‘sheep, &oxen, &…, &camels’ (צֹאן-וּבָקָר, וַחֲמֹרִים, וַעֲבָדִים וּשְׁפָחֹת, וַאֲתֹנֹת וּגְמַלִּים) as articulated as a Repeating Sequence comprises Latching, Suckling, Breathing <try ‘articulating’ silently – while internally ‘looking’ at your mouth>; (12.17) Nursing ‘action’ induces afterbirth contractions!

(18.20) the great cry (burning in the Diaper ‘area’); Yitzhak is the deep chuckle feeling external-adults experience when looking at the (‘finally’) somewhat active infant; YishmaEl literally is causality awareness – hearing/answering Nature’s call; (21.16) ‘a bow-shot’ distance is the arc of excreted ‘water’ when the little boy is being ‘toilet trained’. 

The offering (sacrifice) of Yitzhak is (another) conflict between two internal (of numerous) personality states – where the newer state (Yitzhak) feels obligated to venerate the older state (Avruhum) in this early childhood Imaginary Episode (which includes countless aspects: the Bronze Age child observes from adult activities) – while the culmination (22.13) is an external observation of the child self-generating a choice (whereas before – the child just jumped from one imaginary construct to another) – THUS it is now worthwhile for parents to seek out a bored-talkative young girl to companion/teach this little boy – albeit there is a dramatic tension in their search, since one worries if maybe the parents are taking on responsibility for a young babysitter rather than finding/solving free time outside of constant parenting childcare.

>BEHOLD< Irrevocable-Irreversable (23.1) Life-attribute Sarah [100*20*7] is 14000 cubic-years; (25.7) Life-attribute Avruhum [100*70*5] is 35000 cubic-years; (25.17) Life-attribute YishmaEl [100*30*7] is 21000 cubic-years >THUS< Life-attributes: Sarah +plus+ YishmaEl =equals= Life-attribute Avruhum!

Yaakov is ‘to pause, ‘to wait’, ‘to contemplate’, ‘to analyse’ -thus- to begin learning/appreciating cause-and-effect -while- Esauv is ‘to do’, ‘to be impulsive’ -thus- Esauv prefers or reverts to childish irresponsibility (from causal outcomes) ⇒ until puberty, the parents educational struggles comprise a constant re-education re-enforcement of the Yaakov maturation – albeit with tolerant intervals for playful Esauv exploration experiences. 

Quantum-Jumping to puberty’s onset: each (tribal/son) name corresponds to a body part → reflected throughout Torat-Moshe in frequent census-taking – sometimes including various clinical-commentary ‘personal’ names and/or ancestries – each such census equivalent to awareness/recording internal thoughts, feelings, orientations, self-conscious assessments, etc.; whereas Reuven is ‘visual-seeing’; Shimon is ‘auditory-hearing’; Levi is ‘olfactory-accompanyment awareness’; Yehuda is ‘oral-articulation’ (preferably expressing gratitude); Yizchar is ‘visceral-digestion’; Zevulin is ‘visceral-extreatment’; Dina is ‘judgement-assessment’ (considering digestive variability – causal aspects); etc.; Yosef is ‘extra-additional’ (being the male body-part); Binyamin (also Ben-Ohni) are legs [like Moav & Bnai-Amon were about crawling]. 

Whereas identical quality yarn was used for warp & weft of cloth-garments for all other body parts, the weft of Yosef’s loin-cloth was of softer yarn (resulting in striped Texture) → making all the other body parts jealous; thereafter they became even more jealous when realizing: Yosef will directly experience ‘conjugation’ ⇒ essentially leading to the other body parts throwing Yosef into the pit ⇒ eventually selling him to attribute:YishmaEl (hearing/answering the Nature’s call) ‘who’ bring/sell Yosef down to enslavement (in Mitzraim – the closed place). 

Note: Switching between Pharaoh & Melech-Mitzraim is not for literary flair; rather expressing two different internal male interactions with his female mother/or/mate!

These few extracts from my © 2008-2012 Moses Autonomy manuscript should be enough to get you started – slowly & carefully reading Torat-Moshe as a Sequential Development portrayal ‘template’ – internally experienced by a male; continuing (℅TOI) certainly violates numerous scholarly prohibitions. 

Of Practical Halacha Concern: While (trying to be) respectful of Mishnah–cHagigah–2.1; various (PG-40 Mature ADULT Life-Secret?) aspects are public domain accessible via internet (IF this Mishnah is actually ‘thus’ cautioning → inclusive of subsequent Talmudic discussions, commentaries, etc.) – i naively suspect this Mishnah is ‘politely’ relating to ‘other’ matters; implied above; and more!