Tara L. Laxer

Success of the Iran War, the bad and ugly next

Since the beginning of the 2026 Iran war, the United States and Israel have made decisive, strategic advances that are quietly but meaningfully shifting the situation in a more secure direction. In the earliest phase of the conflict, targeted strikes disrupted Iran’s highest levels of leadership, fracturing command structures and limiting the regime’s ability to respond in a coordinated way. That alone reduced uncertainty and helped prevent a more chaotic escalation.

At the same time, a sustained air campaign has struck more than 12,000 military targets, dismantling missile production, weakening air defenses, and reducing Iran’s ability to carry out large-scale attacks. Reports that roughly 90% of Iran’s missile and drone capabilities have been degraded are especially significant—this translates directly into fewer threats reaching U.S. forces, Israel, and surrounding allies. Strikes on key nuclear facilities like Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan have also slowed Iran’s nuclear progress, easing what had been one of the most urgent global concerns.

The consistency of over 13,000 combat flights shows not just activity, but control—ongoing ability to operate with precision and purpose. And moments like the successful rescue of two American airmen from inside Iran highlight something just as important: capability, coordination, and a commitment to protecting lives even under extreme conditions.

This is undeniably a difficult and unsettling situation. But in moments like these, focusing on what is working—and what is improving—matters. The reality is that key threats have already been significantly reduced, major objectives are being actively advanced, and the overall trajectory is one of increasing control rather than chaos. While no conflict is without risk, there is real, measurable progress being made, and that progress is what helps create stability over time.

About the Author
Tara Laxer is a policy-focused writer and advocate with hands-on experience in legislative and advocacy work. She previously worked for a State Senate, contributing to one of the first bills to divest public funds from Iran and Sudan—part of a broader national movement to use state investments as a tool of foreign policy. She later served as an advisor to United Against Nuclear Iran, helping advance bipartisan legislation across more than 20 states aimed at countering Iran’s economic influence. Laxer is also a strong advocate for women and girls, integrating these priorities into her policy work.
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.