The Age of Enablers

Terrorism operates on three levels within society. There are those who incite it, those who commit it and those who tolerate it.

One can argue that these groups do not bear equal responsibility. Yet, judging by the outcome, it is hard to say who is less dangerous: the terrorist, the one who incites him, or the one who could have acted somehow – and chose not to.

One thing is clear: the attack in Sydney will not be the last.

It is the prologue to a tragedy that is only “just” beginning.

“Just”. For there have been countless events that preceded it, some of which happened to be quite violent and extremely worrying.  All of these, however, were soon forgotten as a worldwide anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli hysteria took hold. And this hysteria has been long in the making, funded and orchestrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, that is Qatar and Turkey – in collaboration with Iran.

It’s an irrefutable fact that this was what ultimately led to the massacres of October 7.

Everything that followed stems from October 7; without it, none of this would have happened. Isn’t it astonishing that so many pretend to forget this basic fact? In addition to that shortly after 72% of Palestinians said that they supported the attacks.

The West had by then already become estranged. Under the guise of ‘progress’, dissent was silenced by an orthodoxy enforced by hypocrisy and political correctness. The crowds ended up embracing islamism as it spread.

Ignorance and stupidity became a fashion statement.

Members of the LGBT community marched proudly beside the far left – and alongside Islamists, the very people who, if they believed they could do so without consequence, would throw them off the nearest rooftop.

Nowadays, it has become “improper” to even say this plainly: that those who openly hate the West and dream of “cleansing” it with their paranoid ideas, have absolutely no place among us — and that living in the West carries obligations apart from rights, especially when we are the ones paying the bill.

So does this mean all Muslims are like this? No. Even if many are, most are not. And it isn’t difficult to distinguish Islamism from Islam, even if the line between them can be thin and, at times, blurred.

Islamism is neither a right nor a form of pluralism – any more than fascism is, or communism should be. Any movement or ideology that aims to dismantle democracy by advancing totalitarianism, hatred or racism is a threat to our basic freedoms.

We must confront it with a response proportionate to the danger.

Religions are ideologies too. Ideologies have no rights; people do. Democracy provides the most obvious and fair consensus on where those rights begin and where they end.

Misunderstanding tolerance is what brought us to this point – and that same attitude now allows Islamists to further exploit the West’s weaknesses, aided by a far-left fringe that also rejects the West and liberal democracy, because the West’s very existence exposes how bankrupt their ideologies are.

Over the past two years, Jews around the world have faced a shameful wave of harassment and violence – sometimes openly incited, too often quietly tolerated.

A motley coalition of Islamists, far-leftists and imbeciles of every possible kind has helped cultivate this climate by laundering hatred through slogans like the “globalize  the intifada”—a euphemism for terrorism, including the murder of civilians and even children. As well as by turning convicted killers into “heroes,” Marwan Barghouti being the prime example.

Meanwhile, much of the public still has little grasp of the scale. In Australia alone, from October 7 to the end of September 2025, 4,211 antisemitic incidents were reported – ranging from threats and vandalism to attempted arson and physical assaults.

And yet, where was the Australian government? How many instigators were deported? How many extremist mosques were shut down? By all appearances, none.

Today, we even learned that Canberra had known about the Bondi attacker’s links to ISIS since 2019. Like so many terrorists before him—there and elsewhere—he was “under surveillance.”

So what are we meant to call this: negligence or something closer to complicity?

Across Europe, Hamas narratives and media theatre reliably whip up outrage, while the bloodiest realities are downplayed. Add a selective zeal for mass immigration in the name of “pluralism” – focused overwhelmingly on Muslim migration, not on non-Muslim Asians or Latin Americans, let’s say – and the pattern is hard to miss.

In Italy, even deporting a preacher who praised October 7 as “resistance” has sparked roadblocks and vandalism – backed by the same self-styled “progressive” alliance.

The West watches, paralyzed by fear of being called “anti-democratic” by people who despise democracy, and by politics softened by money and influence – Qatar’s basically.

A line must be drawn: those who value freedom and democracy must stand unequivocally against the ones who bully, silence, and intimidate their way to authoritarianism—whether through religious extremism, ideological policing, or outright dictatorship.

If we don’t protect what we have, it will soon be too late – if it isn’t already, that is.