Gilles Touboul

The behavior of a decapitated system

A picture taken from a Turkish Navy drone-carrying amphibious assault ship, shows a Turkish Frigate and an Italian vessel during a NATO exercise in the Adriatic Sea on September 24, 2025. (Alberto PIZZOLI/AFP)

Is post-Khamenei Iran following a blind roadmap?

What we observe corresponds to a real phenomenon that can be called ‘pre-programmed emergency plans.’ That’s why:
1. The decapitation of leadership creates a decision-making vacuum
Among Khamenei’s potential successors within the IRGC, many were killed in strikes, making an orderly transition very difficult.
2. An improvised crisis council takes over
Ali Larijani announced the establishment of a temporary leadership council. This council executes what was planned before, without thinking it through, because it lacks the time, legitimacy, and authority to improvise.
3. The pre-established roadmap is mechanically activated
The strikes on the Gulf countries—including relative allies—are not the result of a thoughtful strategic decision. They correspond to operational plans of the IRGC designed upstream for a situation of “existential aggression,” activatable without a central political order.

Why hit ‘friends’ from the Gulf? The Emirates, Qatar, and Kuwait host American bases. In IRGC logic, they are not “”friends”—they are vectors of American power.

The roadmap says to “hit American interests in the region.” The hosts of these databases are targets by geographical association, not by political calculation.

The real danger of this mechanism
This is precisely the risk of unintended Escalation: a system that runs without a brain cannot negotiate, cannot back down, and cannot distinguish between opportunity and threat. Iranian President Pezeshkian described revenge as a “legitimate duty,” an ideological language, not strategic. It’s the voice of an autopilot system.

What we are observing is not a coherent Iranian strategy; it is the mechanical execution of a massive retaliation doctrine designed for an annihilation scenario—without regard to diplomatic consequences or even regional “alliances.” This is precisely what makes the situation dangerous: one does not negotiate with a protocol. One does not reason with a roadmap that turns itself.

About the Author
Gilles Touboul is passionate geopolitical analyst and former trader specializing in Asian and Middle Eastern markets. An observer of international upheavals, he regularly speaks on topics related to conflicts, international relations, and the impact of geopolitics on the global economy. A graduate in oriental languages and international relations, Gilles lives in Israel
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.