Tolerance can't be measured in degrees of Intolerance
The Greens, the Triumph of Fascism, and a Religious War
Headline in “Ynet Global” on 4th October 2026. “Israel’s religious turn risks transforming the conflict into a religious war” By Dr. Michael Milshtein (senior researcher at the Moshe Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University.)
Israel’s religious turn risks transforming the conflict into a religious war
Dr Milshtein admits that “the main challenge is fundamental Islam.” The Islamic faith prohibits returning conquered land, which is understood to be an eternal patrimony for the global Islamic nation, to infidels. He admits the best result we can hope for is a hudna – a temporary truce with the Islamic faithful. He fails to mention that theologically, a hudna is permitted to last only for as long as is necessary to defeat and annihilate the enemy. That is the sole purpose of a hudna – time required to overcome a strategic military disadvantage. Theologically, a temporary truce should not last longer than ten years although it has never prevented Muslim empires from using the absence of hostilities to massively profit from the relationship, or even to develop alliances with infidel nations against other Muslim nations. Dr. Milshtein does refer to a hudna being inevitably broken by a 10/7 style attack (slaughter of the innocents).
Islamic extremists view a world of constant conflict between the faithful and the rest. Violence, slavery and death are viewed as an appropriate ‘lessons for those who fail to adhere to inferior status. If this sounds like classical Roman rule then you would be right.
In classic Roman rule there was no honour in not dominating your opponents. Acts of rape, torture, and mass slaughter were not subject to morality or ethics (except when dealing with fellow citizens and even then, acts of sedition cancelled out any rights a citizen might ‘enjoy’.) Violence was simply an aspect of domination and control.
We should not reduce ourselves to celebrating as our enemies do, the institutionalisation of malice. The hostility of Ben Gvir and Moshe Feiglin are not Judaism. But to describe the relationship between Israel and the new-Palestinians as anything less than a religious war is also delusional.
10/7 should have taught us the advisability of not succumbing to blind faith and especially, not to succumb to secular naiveté.
We have been fighting a religious war since we started to reassert our fundamental human rights in the nineteenth century, not just in Israel.
The Green Party of England and Wales are a political party dedicated to safeguarding the environment through biodiversity and measures meant to rid the planet of man-made pollution. Recently, they passed a policy motion (on 4 October 2026) that designated Zionism as a form of racism. The resolution called for a one-state solution to the Israel-Palestine Conflict. In Israel, approximately two million Muslims enjoy greater human rights than the overwhelming majority of the 2 billion Muslims found in the Muslim world. However, apparently, at least according to demagogues and activists of the Green Party, Israel is an ethnocentric Jewish nation while over two billion Muslims exist in a multiethnic paradise. At least 49 Muslim states are dictatorships, and most are ethnostates, but this is deemed irrelevant to the Greens.
The Greens are a party of fascism. They demand our human sacrifice on their altar of unity. It is the classic antisemitic strategy. Hold up “the Jew” (now relabelled as a “Zionist”) as uniquely evil and to hell with any of the contrary evidence. Hate is an instrument, a vehicle that unifies the amoral masses – of all classes and creeds. Of course, a creed is a system of religious beliefs, but organised hate requires a scapegoat and the espousal of an unquestioning faith. This is the essence of any quasi-religious, political fundamentalism. Facts are an obstacle, a complication in the dissemination of a prejudiced narrative. A person of hate does not need facts.
In contemporary society we exclude any relevant information by a device called non-platforming, along with the denial of safe spaces and use of intimidatory tactics such as doxing to allow the “right-kind” of hate speech to flourish. This too is fascism.
It is bewildering but intersectionality, a term its founder referred to as “a system of interlocking oppressions” is used to create a new pyramid of oppression, fuelled by hatred, and prejudice. It places the most vicious champions of the new apartheid – foot soldiers and their masters, at the top of a new oppression pyramid. These are the new “social-injustice warriors” of Islamic Extremism and the Fascist Left. Their new system of injustice places Jews and ‘Whites’ in ‘their’ place at the bottom of the pyramid. But Jews will usually be their initial target. It is Cultural Colonialism; rapidly developing into a devolved system of oppression and persecution.
Unsurprisingly, the bigot will explain, as if talking to an infuriating simpleton (me) that fascism is right-wing, not left-wing. But Fascism has never been restricted to a geographic point on a compass. It is a mindset of replacement, silencing, the lie as truth and the replaced truth as fiction. And modern-day ethical thinking is framed in carefully delineated absolutes. So, Left is good, Right is bad. Forget the Holodomor, the Khmer Rouge, Baathism, and the murderous atrocities of the radical-Left’s exponents.
Jews are that easy target amongst those political or religious groups that need to hate to survive. That is our reality.
Fascism grants the outlier (Jew) conditional human rights. This is an oxymoron but essential to the very healthy financial position of the global Human Rights community. When one’s human rights are conditioned on silence or on the parroting of a self-abnegating story-line, and when any divergent opinion is ill-tolerated to the point of intimidation, violence, and murder then this too is fascism.
The acceptance of our equal rights in society should be non-negotiable but in the world of Islamist extremism where hierarchies of dominance demand a continuous demonstration of power, scapegoating is essential if dictatorships are to retain their hold on power. It is the reason that the global (Selective) Human Rights community, led by the United Nations Organisation is so selective in its apportionment of rights. Appeasement is both financially lucrative and low-risk. Jews have always been peripheral in numbers and divided. Therefore, we represent the eternally easy target.
So, how to deal with an avalanche of hate? How do we deal with a narrative of deception? In the 21st Century, the only way to win a religious war is to not fight it.
Diplomacy will not work either because we are too small in number. As a non-missionary faith, we will always be thus. Being a marginal group makes us easy prey to the predator.
In a world that fears meaningful engagement, while worshipping at the simpletons’ altar of social media, the best way to fight a religious war is to rub their noses in their religious hypocrisy, their bigotry, and their prejudice. When winning is dependent on convincing others of your virtue, of proving to others your victimhood; and on being the presumptive loser in an existential battle we must clarify the muddied water and demonstrate the mendacity, the hate, and the malevolence of our opponents. Because when we are dealing with a hate movement; when we are dealing with a fascists’ antisemitic conspiracy there is only good and evil. The entire strategy of our enemies is that we are evil incarnate – unadulterated and irredeemable. The logical outcome is genocide. If that is going to change, the stench has to transfer back onto our hate infused enemy. There is no other way.
It is the only way to “convince” others of our right to exist! It sounds obscene. IT IS. Only in a world that has lost its way, only in a world of fascism do we have to convince our oppressor that we too, have always had and still do have rights.
Our enemies like things simple and binary: right and wrong, good verses bad. Duality not complexity. There is nothing like a gaggle of elderly, white-haired Caucasians with a couple of young children in tow, waving their banners or standing in gloomy silence to impress the gullible with their passion for “justice.” At the turn of the 20th Century the British Foreign Office had the toxic reputation (much envied) for being able to smile at you, while stabbing you in the back. Britain has upped its game, several times since then. Laughably, they still call us ‘friends’ even as they ignore and therefore encourage the violence against us. Our streets have been colonised by the Blackshirts, the Greenshirts and the Redshirts.
The power of the English and Welsh Greens, and their admirers, is in their ability to express their hatred openly. That is the reality of evil; non-philosophic and radical. Ignorance dressed up as virtue. And that will always excite groups and ideologies like HAMAS, Fatah, and the Greens. They are anything but exceptional.