They Rebuilt. But Were They Fine?
“After the Holocaust, people didn’t talk about trauma. They got married, had children, and rebuilt their lives. Why can’t people do the same today?”
It’s usually said with good intentions. Sometimes with frustration. Occasionally with judgment.
And every time, I feel uncomfortable. Because part of it is true. And part of it is not.
Yes, people rebuilt. They built families. They built businesses. They built a country. They created life in places where there had been almost none left.
But that is only part of the story. The real question is what they carried while building it.
For many years, we told ourselves a simple story. They were strong. They moved on.
In my own family, that story exists.
My grandparents came from Greece, France, Germany, and Hungary. Each of them has a different story of how they survived the war. They lost almost everything. And they rebuilt.
They created stability. They moved forward. They had children, grandchildren and even met some of their great grandchildren. They often called them “my revenge on Hitler.”
But they also passed other things on.
A fear of saying goodbye like it might be the last time. A feeling that safety is temporary. An instinct to always be ready to move, that slowing down is dangerous.
This part is harder to see. And harder to measure.
The data helps us see what we could not always name.
Large studies comparing Holocaust survivors to people who were not exposed show higher levels of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms, even decades later (Barel et al., 2010; Yehuda et al., 2015). Sleep problems, hypervigilance, emotional distress. These did not just disappear with time.
So yes, many functioned. But functioning is not the same as being well. And it is not the same as thriving.
There is another piece we tend to forget. They were living in a world that did not even have the words for what they had been through.
PTSD only entered the DSM in 1980, influenced by veterans of Vietnam and the Yom Kippur War. Before that, clinicians used vague terms. Depressed. Agitated. Sometimes even “nostalgic.”
In notes from therapists in Israel working with Holocaust survivors, patients are clearly suffering. And still, the connection to what they experienced during the war is sometimes described as “unclear”. Today, it sounds almost absurd. At the time, it was reality.
There was no shared language. No framework. No recognition that trauma could shape a person for years, sometimes for life. So people lived with something they could not name.
And when you cannot name something, you cannot really understand it. You cannot explain it. And you usually cannot treat it.
Having words does not make the pain go away. But it changes what becomes possible.
Once trauma was recognized, patterns started to emerge. Symptoms appearing years later. Effects on sleep, relationships, physical health. Even impact across generations (Yehuda et al., 2015).
We also began to understand something more subtle: two things can be true at the same time.
A person can build a life and still carry fear. Raise a family and still feel anxious. Function and still suffer.
Resilience and pain are not opposites. They often sit next to each other.
So when we say “they were fine,” we may be confusing what we saw with what was actually there.
We saw the weddings. The children. The rebuilding. We did not always see the nightmares. The silence. The internal effort it took just to keep going.
And this is where today matters. After October 7, we are not in the same place. We have language. We have data. We have clinical understanding that did not exist before.
We know early support can change trajectories. We know trauma can resolve on its own but that it can also stay. We know how to identify it, and often how to treat it. Not perfectly. But better than before.
We do not think everyone will struggle long term. But it does mean we have a responsibility we did not have then.
To notice. To name. To respond.
Yom HaShoah is about memory. But it is also a moment where comparisons come up, whether we want them to or not.
We look back at something almost impossible to grasp. And we try to extract meaning for today.
Maybe one of the lessons is this.
They did something extraordinary. They rebuilt. Under conditions we can barely imagine. And they did it without the tools we now have. No language. No recognition. No systems built around healing.
But maybe the question is not: why aren’t people today just getting on with it?
Maybe the question is: what do we do differently, now that we know more?
Today we have language. We have data. We have tools. And that changes things. Because once you can name something, you cannot pretend it isn’t there.
We inherited their strength. That is clear. We will rebuild. We always do.
But if we stop there, we are choosing to repeat the same story.
The real opportunity is to do something more. To build systems that do not just help people function, but actually help them heal.
So that the next generation inherits strength, and less of the fear we quietly carry.
Because rebuilding is only part of the story. Healing is the rest.
