Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews -- For those who like their news and truths frank and sharp

Why would Judaism need a clear definition of gayness?

See my blog post of yesterday for a new definition of sexual orientation.

To understanding why Judaism would need a clear definition of gayness, one requires a different frame of mind than the Western permissive one. Let me try to explain that part of Orthodox Judaism.

NB: Although many straight and some gay people equate sex with intercourse only, sex is clearly much more. This is important because present Jewish Law forbids any and all gay sex, not just penetration (see: Jewish Law Forbids all of Homosexuality).

1. The rules of Orthodox Judaism seem restrictive – don’t do this and do do that. However, in reality they rather permit. What right does anyone have to take up space and attention, to require money, to eat and drink, to kill for food and in war, etc. The non-religious should be so ethical that they feel paralyzed by all the ethical dilemmas. In the same vein: What right does one have to bother anyone else with one’s sexual needs? Is this bothering permitted once the other will bother you with theirs? Judaism says yes under certain conditions.

2. These conditions are general for the general person. They are based on many principles: what is good for most people, what will challenge people to become more moral (instead of being stable in their present state), what is good for the community and society.

3. Judaism tries to train us to be giving. If everyone gives, everyone receives. That is radically different from a “rights” worldview that tries to get everyone to receive. The latter makes people focused on entitlement and competing for receiving or even grabbing. So, rather than that everyone has a right to autonomy, Judaism teaches that no one should take away someone else’s autonomy.

4. Judaism advocates a lifestyle more than a mindset. In the end, what one feels and thinks is hardly prescribed. Judaism is not a “belief” – it is a guidebook for (in)actions. Its Codes of Law only fit most people and most situations. Specialists can help in more specific situations. Life and humans are too complicated to be guided comprehensively by some limited text.

5. Judaism has different obligations for men and women, and Jews and Gentiles. This may per definition seem bigotry from an outsider’s viewpoint. However, one should remember that the world’s acknowledgement of equal rights for all stems from Judaism. These differences are to assign different obligations and responsibilities, not different rights, whereby the most capable get obligated the most!

6. The Codes of Law are also meant to protect what is unique in Judaism, against assimilation and watering down its specialness. Therefore it will often take a stand against the craze of the day and the beliefs and practices of other traditions or populations. Therefore, only most slowly will any formal change and improvement of it be applied. There is a palpable fear of throwing out the child with the bathwater. No one likes all of Judaism’s Laws. We often stay within its framework because we appreciate enough of them – sometimes even the aspects we hate (monthly total physical separation for the menstrual period).

7. The Codes of Law are based on absolute principles: that life needs to benefit each of us, that our principles should let us live rather than die, that we are meant to enjoy life (within limits), that we all should be kind, giving, forgiving, responsible, grateful, trying to improve our character, raising the next generation of loyal Jews, be helpful to all other people on the planet, etc.

8. However, the Codes of Law are unhelpful where they are or became wrong. Happens. They have never been as wrong as about male homosexuality for homosexuals. Changes will go very unhurried. Also the position of women in Judaism is shifting at a snail’s pace.

9. The rabbis cannot replace the Codes by making women and men, straight and gays, Jews and Gentiles equal. That would throw out too much of our valuable tradition. However, the Codes were always meant to protect and guide the individual and community – never to harm or oppress. Therefore the Codes will change, but it will take time. Meanwhile, it is important to support religious Jews to go against the letter of the Codes (gasp) where they would make their lives impossible!

10. Sex is good for becoming one flesh, healthy, holy (special, not to squander), an obligation to husbands and a right of wives. It must be done in private, with consent, while not drunk, to the liking of the woman, to the free choosing between the partners.

11. People can do with their lives whatever they want but the rules in Judaism will always challenge us to strive for what seems to be best (but maybe difficult) for most people. In exceptional cases we’d ask others for guidance in order not to end up having just self-serving guidelines.

Having read that, maybe you can understand the value of forbidding anal sex for heterosexual men (because it often addicts and makes such men often leave their wives for a life dictated by pleasure instead of by responsibility (wife, kids) which will be the most pleasurable in the long run). Maybe you can then see why Judaism needs to distinguish gay and straight: in order to permit gay men what would stay forbidden to straight men. This distinction is then to permit, not to limit. Judaism can also not support experimenting with sex. It reserves it for after the wedding. It holds that experimenting leads people to get hurt. This restriction is not because sex is bad or dirty – it is too holy to squander and people to valuable and vulnerable to be used as guinea pigs.

And therefore I want to redefine gay, to permit new rules that enable the rabbis to support a Jewish gay monogamous lifestyle. Gay then cannot mean: what one does or feels like. It must be something biological. As it seems to be. Judaism will never permit sex outside of marriage or any other framework without obligations.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe too, here: or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (, born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here:
Related Topics
Related Posts