Ryan Aviv Fagan
A Midwestern Jewish Politico

A Moment of Hope Amid the Longest War

For nearly two years, the war in Gaza has consumed lives, hardened positions, and left Israelis, Palestinians, and much of the world feeling locked in an endless cycle of grief. The Friday evening announcement from Hamas that it is willing to release all Israeli hostages — both alive and dead — as part of U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to end the conflict is, for the first time in many months, a genuine breakthrough that should inspire a sense of hope.

The words matter. For Hamas to signal readiness not only to free hostages but also to discuss the future administration of Gaza is a shift of historic proportions. In its official response, Hamas opened the door to handing Gaza over to an independent Palestinian body, backed by Arab and Islamic states. That may not sound revolutionary on paper, but in practice it is a recognition that perpetual conflict is unsustainable, and that compromise — however begrudging — may finally be possible.

While Trump will undoubtedly take the credit for any signed agreement, it is important to acknowledge that the framework for this moment was laid under President Joe Biden. His administration spent years painstakingly stitching together regional cooperation, leveraging relationships with Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia to build channels of communication that did not exist before. Biden’s team built trust with Israel while also insisting on humanitarian considerations for Palestinians. The current outline — international oversight in Gaza, a pathway for Palestinian governance, and the centrality of hostage release — was developed in large part during his final year in office.

Without Biden’s groundwork, Trump would not have had a viable proposal to present. This is a classic moment in international politics: one leader sows the seeds, another harvests the crop. Unfortunately, the public rarely remembers the farmer. Biden deserves gratitude for pushing the idea of a transitional authority in Gaza and for encouraging Arab states to step forward as guarantors of peace. He recognized that Palestinians could not accept a plan that looked like foreign control, but neither Israelis nor the broader world would accept Hamas continuing to govern after the devastation of the war. That paradox is now closer to being resolved.

The symbolism of Hamas offering to release hostages cannot be overstated. Hostages have been the darkest thread of this war, embodying the fear, anger, and helplessness that permeated Israeli society. Their safe return has been a national obsession. Even the return of remains would represent dignity, closure, and the beginning of healing. For Hamas to place this on the table signals both weakness and pragmatism: weakness, because it shows the toll of the conflict on their own survival; pragmatism, because they recognize that refusing a deal risks total isolation from the Arab world.

Equally significant is the willingness to discuss Gaza’s future governance within a Palestinian national framework. That language matters — it nods toward unity between Hamas, Fatah, and other factions under a broader Palestinian umbrella. No one expects this unity to be easy. But if Palestinians themselves can forge a joint position, backed by Arab states, the possibility of a credible political alternative to Hamas in Gaza becomes real. That would transform not only Gaza but also the prospects of restarting a political horizon between Israel and the Palestinians.

Peace is never inevitable, but moments like this are rare. After two years of death and destruction, a window has opened. Israelis deserve to live without rockets or the agony of missing loved ones. Palestinians deserve to live without siege, bombardment, and endless uncertainty. The proposal on the table, for all its flaws and ambiguities, creates a path where none existed.

There will be stumbling blocks: disagreements over who administers Gaza, fears inside Israel about security guarantees, and deep skepticism on both sides. But hope is built not on perfection, but on possibility. The simple fact that negotiations are being contemplated — openly, formally, and with Arab support — should remind us that no conflict is permanent, and that leadership, however imperfect, can shift the trajectory.

Trump will stand before cameras and declare himself the dealmaker who ended the Gaza war. And in fairness, if he delivers signatures and implementation, he will deserve credit. But we should not forget the quiet, unglamorous diplomacy of Joe Biden and his team, who created the scaffolding for this moment. Their persistence, often mocked as ineffective, now reveals its true value. In a world quick to dismiss incrementalism, this is the fruit of it.

So yes, let Trump take his bows. But let us also say thank you to Joe Biden. He did not live to see the deal sealed, politically speaking, but his steady hand made it possible. That is worth remembering, worth honoring, and worth holding onto — especially in this rare and fragile moment of hope.

About the Author
Reform Jew. Husband. Father. Political Junkie. Failed Political Candidate. Marketing Guy. Time Magazine 2006 Person of the Year. Minnesotan.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.