Arkady Bukh

ABA in Action: How Culture Shapes Autism Care in the US and Israel

A rising number of autism diagnoses globally is driving research into viable treatments; this, in turn, is generating discussions about how best to serve individuals with autism and pushing the need for additional study in this area.

How are cultural and systemic differences influencing the application of ABA, a controversial (yet scientifically based and widely used) treatment for autism, in Israel and the United States?

Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy, a common intervention for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), uses structured techniques like positive reinforcement to improve specific behaviors. Despite its popularity, ABA therapy is controversial; proponents highlight its effectiveness in skill development, while critics argue that its intensive methods can be dehumanizing.

The USA’s extensive research, resources, and some established infrastructure for ABA therapy have significantly influenced global autism intervention strategies. Israel, despite its smaller size, has a well-developed healthcare system and a unique cultural context that influences how therapies are adopted and implemented. Studying and comparing different strategies can strengthen global support networks for children with autism, leading to more informed choices.

ABA Therapy in the US

In the United States, ABA therapy has a lot of support, with over 33,000 therapists and 100+ companies providing it. The CDC estimates that 1 in 36 kids in the U.S. is diagnosed with ASD.

Opinions on ABA therapy are divided. Many parents and professionals see it as the go-to treatment for autism due to its research backing and track record of improving communication, social skills, and adaptive behaviors. Major organizations like the American Psychiatric Association support ABA. However, there’s significant pushback, especially from the autistic community, who argue that ABA’s focus on compliance and behavior control can be harmful and stressful.

In the U.S., ABA therapy is heavily supported by both the government and insurance companies. Many states require insurance to cover ABA, making it more accessible for families. This support has helped the ABA market grow significantly, with projections indicating it could reach $4 billion by 2032.

ABA Therapy in Israel

In Israel, ABA therapy is also widely used for treating autism and is incorporated into public and private healthcare systems, schools, and specialized centers. Attitudes towards ABA therapy in Israel are varied. Many parents and professionals appreciate ABA for its structured methods and positive outcomes. However, similar to the U.S., the autistic community and some professionals are growing critical of ABA’s ethics and intense behavior modification focus. The Israeli government and health insurance providers strongly support ABA therapy.

Facing the Critics

In both countries, ABA therapy faces significant ethical challenges and criticism. Critics argue that ABA’s intense focus on behavior modification and compliance can be dehumanizing and disrespectful to autistic individuals’ natural ways of being. Concerns about the use of rewards and punishments, seen as manipulative by some, add to the ethical issues, compounded by varying therapy quality due to inadequate practitioner training.

Many autistic individuals report stress, anxiety, and trauma from intensive ABA sessions, feeling pressured to conform to neurotypical standards. This has led to calls for more compassionate, individualized treatment approaches that prioritize emotional well-being over mere behavioral changes.

Critics also highlight the overemphasis on making autistic children appear “normal,” which can result in masking their natural behaviors. This focus on normalcy can overshadow their unique strengths and lead to mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, from the pressure to conform.

Additionally, ABA’s development by non-autistic individuals without input from the autistic community raises concerns about its effectiveness in genuinely addressing autistic needs. The growing call is for ABA to evolve, incorporating more ethical, empathetic, and inclusive practices to ensure the well-being and individuality of autistic individuals are respected and valued.

Attitudes and Practices Between the USA and Israel

Parents and professionals in both countries value ABA’s structured, evidence-based approach. Both have integrated ABA into their healthcare and educational systems.

Nevertheless, cultural differences greatly influence the implementation and perception of ABA therapy, which in turn shape societal attitudes towards it. The focus on individualism in the USA aligns with ABA’s goals of increasing independence and specific skills. American parents and professionals often prioritize interventions that help children gain autonomy, explaining ABA’s wide acceptance.

Conversely, Israel’s collectivist culture promotes a holistic view of therapy, considering the family unit and community alongside individual progress. Israeli families and professionals emphasize communal well-being and cohesion, adapting interventions to include family dynamics and collective goals.

Cultural competency is a must for ABA practitioners in both countries. There is growing recognition of the need for cultural awareness in ABA services in the USA, which encourages continuous learning, reflection on biases, and adaptation of practices to meet cultural needs. Similarly, in Israel, ABA implementation must consider cultural norms and values, requiring informal discussions with families to build trust and bilingual support to overcome language barriers.

Impact of Governmental Policies

Government policies significantly impact ABA therapy implementation and reception in both countries. Federal and state laws in the USA mandate insurance coverage for ABA therapy, while the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) supports its inclusion in educational settings. Israel’s government also strongly supports ABA therapy through national health insurance plans, though coverage and availability can differ.

Alternative Approaches

In both countries, there’s a shift towards alternative approaches to supporting children with autism. Driven by concerns over ABA therapy’s ethical implications and a desire for more holistic methods, parents and professionals are exploring options like “Low-Demand Parenting” and natural consequences. These approaches aim to create supportive environments that respect children’s pace and preferences.

Other therapeutic methods, such as Social Skills Training, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), are well-established and integrated into both countries’ healthcare systems. The growing interest in these alternatives highlights a broader movement towards personalized and empathetic autism support.

Investigating the differences between ABA therapy in the USA and Israel provides valuable insights into how different cultures and policies shape autism treatment. The USA’s extensive resources and influential policies often set the stage for global practices, while Israel’s unique cultural context and healthcare system offer a different perspective.

This comparative look helps us understand the best ways to support children with autism, aiming to improve outcomes and ensure every child gets the care they need.

About the Author
I am a seasoned attorney and a published author. I am a regular contributor to Entrepreneur, Forbes, and other editorials. I will only cover topics that are trendy and fall within my areas of expertise.
Related Topics
Related Posts