America: Doing Nothing Doesn’t Make The Threat Go Away

In 1944, as millions of Jews were being slaughtered in Nazi concentration camps, Chaim Weizmann, the prominent Zionist leader and future first President of Israel, made an impassioned plea to the US government: “We are fighting for our lives and for the lives of our children. It is not just our future that is at stake, but the future of the whole world.”

This heart-wrenching cry for help was directed at a nation that had the power to intervene, but America hesitated. The gates of freedom and security stayed closed back then, and six million Jews perished. Inaction wasn’t just a failure—it was a full-on disaster. And now, as we face the growing threat of Iran, America seems to be stuck in a déjà vu. We’re hearing the same nonsense we heard before World War II: “Let’s sit this one out. Not our problem.”

Just like in the 1940s, some voices in America—Tucker Carlson, Dave Smith, and even Jeffrey Sachs—are pushing for the US to focus inward, avoid global conflicts, and let Israel handle its own problems. Because why bother when you can just let Iran have its way, right?

Jeffrey Sachs, the Economist who probably thinks the best foreign policy is to bake cookies and pretend bad things aren’t happening, argues that America should stay out of Iran’s business. He claims US military intervention in the Middle East has only made things worse. Yes, because doing nothing has really worked out well, right? If we ignore the threat today, maybe it’ll magically disappear tomorrow! 

But let’s get real. Sachs’ point completely misses the forest for the trees. America’s military interventions haven’t been perfect—newsflash. But turning a blind eye to Iran’s growing nuclear ambitions is a far worse choice. A nuclear Iran won’t just threaten Israel. It’ll destabilize the entire Middle East and drag America into a much larger conflict, whether it wants to be involved or not.

History has shown us that standing by while global threats brew only invites disaster. Chaim Weizmann’s words from 1942 are as relevant today as they were back then: “We are fighting for our lives and for the lives of our children. It is not just our future that is at stake, but the future of the whole world.” If America doesn’t act now, it may very well find itself facing a much worse catastrophe in the future. America has the power to stop Iran—now is the time to act before it’s too late.

During the years leading up to World War II, many American leaders and citizens believed that the US should remain neutral, echoing the isolationist sentiment of the time. However, there were key figures and moments in history that warned of the consequences of inaction.

One such moment came from Winston Churchill, the British Prime Minister, who famously appealed to the United States for support. In 1940, he stated, “Give us the tools, and we will finish the job.” Churchill’s plea was a direct call to the United States to step in and assist Britain as it stood alone against Nazi Germany. Yet, despite this urgent request, the US remained hesitant, adhering to a policy of non-intervention.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, though a proponent of aiding the Allies, was constrained by isolationist sentiment within the country. In 1939, Roosevelt said, “The United States does not wish to involve itself in the wars of Europe,” illustrating the reluctance of the US to get involved in a foreign conflict. The country continued to believe that the war was “not their fight.”

The turning point came with the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. In response, President Roosevelt declared, “Yesterday, December 7, 1941, a date which will live in infamy, the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.” This speech marked the end of US isolationism and the formal entry into World War II. Roosevelt’s words emphasized the inevitability of America’s involvement when its security was directly threatened, and he concluded with the words: “Now it is America’s duty!” This transformation of a reluctant nation into an active participant in the global conflict serves as a powerful reminder that, when faced with existential threats, neutrality becomes an untenable option.

This moment is a powerful reminder of how inaction in the face of growing global threats can have devastating consequences. Much like the early years of World War II, America’s initial hesitation to intervene in global conflicts today—such as Israel’s defense against Iran—risks leaving a dangerous vacuum that could ultimately force the US into an even more complex situation down the road.

The US-Israel relationship is often framed as a strategic alliance, but it’s much more than that. It’s a partnership based on shared democratic values, a commitment to human dignity, and the defense of liberty in a region that has long been a battleground for ideologies. America’s support for Israel has never been solely about military strategy; it has been about standing with a nation that shares America’s core values.

Israel is the one country in the Middle East where democracy thrives, and supporting Israel’s fight against Iran is about much more than geopolitics. As Caroline Glick, Journalist, Author and now International Affairs Advisor to the Prime Minister of Israel, puts it: “Israel is the first line of defense in the Middle East. If it falls, the threat to America is only a matter of time.” Translation: If Israel falls, so does the West.

By abandoning Israel in its time of need, America isn’t just losing an ally. It’s abandoning its own values. Figures like Senator Tom Cotton get it: “We must ensure that Iran never has the ability to build a nuclear weapon, and that means standing by Israel at all costs.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio isn’t backing down either, reminding us that “The security of Israel is not just a matter for Israelis. It is a matter of national security for America.”

Let’s face it, America’s security isn’t some separate issue from Israel’s. By letting Israel fend for itself, we’re risking much more than an ally—we’re risking everything America stands for.

Iran’s nuclear ambitions are everyone’s problem—not just Israel’s. The Gulf States, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, have been ringing the alarm for a while now, recognizing the catastrophic impact of a nuclear Iran.

And if you don’t trust the Jooooos, and want to dismiss their word, then perhaps you’ll consider what the leaders of these Arab States have to say about it.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said it bluntly: “If Iran acquires a nuclear weapon, we will be forced to follow suit.” Well, that’s great. Just what the world needs—a Middle Eastern nuclear arms race. But here’s the kicker: Iran doesn’t need to just threaten Israel. It’s got its sights set on the entire region—and beyond.

Abdul Khaleq Abdulla, a Political Analyst in the UAE, put it perfectly: “Iran with nuclear weapons is a threat not only to Israel but to the entire Gulf region and to global peace.” The guy gets it. It’s not just about Israel anymore—it’s about the entire geopolitical landscape.

Douglas Murray, Author, GOAT and Political Commentator, sums it up nicely: “Iran’s nuclear ambitions are a direct threat to global peace, and by isolating Israel, the US is only enabling that threat to grow.” Great job, America. Let’s just let Iran get stronger, shall we?

Matt Walsh, Political Commentator, has voiced the argument against intervention, stating, “Iran is not launching a nuclear weapon at the United States. Be serious. Iran is not a threat to my family’s safety.” Sure, Matt, let’s all pretend that ignoring Iran’s nuclear program and its destabilizing activities won’t eventually come knocking at your door.

This approach is dangerous. It assumes that the threat is isolated—that if Iran isn’t directly attacking the US today, everything’s fine. But history’s proven this approach wrong every time. The lesson from World War II is clear: doing nothing doesn’t make the threat go away—it just makes it worse. 

Isolationism might sound cozy in theory, but it’s a terrible long-term strategy. America’s hesitation to get involved in global conflicts—whether during World War II or today—has a funny way of turning into a global disaster.

America needs to recognize that standing with Israel isn’t just a strategic move—it’s a moral imperative. America’s founding fathers built a nation based on liberty, democracy, and justice. And it’s America’s duty to uphold those principles—especially when they’re under threat.

In the same way Chaim Weizmann pleaded for the United States to intervene during the Holocaust, we’re now at a critical crossroads. Weizmann’s words—“We are fighting for our lives and for the lives of our children. It is not just our future that is at stake, but the future of the whole world”— still ring true today.

Once again, the gates of freedom and security are at risk of closing, and once again, we must ask: Will America stand idly by, or will it act to protect the values it holds dear and represents?