Journalist
Antisemitism Thrives Where Governments Look Away
There is a point where expressing sadness is no longer compassionate. It becomes offensive. We have reached that moment.
Whenever Jews are attacked in the Western world, governments respond with the same routine words. They condemn the attacks, express concern, promise to stay alert, and tell Jewish communities they are “not alone.”
And then nothing changes. This is not just tragic. It is negligence.
What we see now is not a sudden increase in antisemitism. It is the result of years of political denial, looking the other way, and fear of setting clear boundaries. Authorities did not “miss the signs.” They chose not to act. Again.
Antisemitism today is obvious. It is not hidden or misunderstood. It is organized, radicalized, and openly justified in some public discussions. People shout it at protests, it is tolerated in parts of academic life, spreads on social media, and is excused as political speech when it targets Jews or Israel.
Governments know it. Intelligence agencies know it. Police know it too.
So let us stop pretending this is about awareness. It is about will. For too long, authorities have seen antisemitism as a social issue, not a security threat. They treat it as a problem to “manage” instead of something to confront. That approach has failed.
The failure is not just emotional. It is practical. When people who openly praise terror are allowed to organize freely, that is not tolerance. It is giving up.
When hatred against Jews is called activism, that is not free speech. It is institutional cowardice.
When hatred against Jews is called activism, that is not free speech. It is institutional cowardice.
If Jewish communities need constant police protection while those who threaten them face no real consequences, something is deeply wrong. And the state bears responsibility for that.
This is not about silencing opinions. It is about enforcing the law.
Democracies already limit speech that incites violence, praises terrorism, or targets groups for harm. The issue is not a lack of laws, but a lack of courage to use them consistently. Especially when the perpetrators come from ideological spaces that politicians are afraid to confront.
Radicalization does not only grow in dark corners. It grows where it is tolerated. Where it is relativized. It is explained away as frustration, anger, or identity politics.
And yes, it spans multiple camps. Islamist extremism, far-left radicalism, and antisemitic conspiracy culture feed off each other. Treating one while ignoring the others is not balanced. It is incompetence.
Israel has learned, often through painful experience, that survival requires clarity. Some lines cannot be crossed. Some ideologies cannot be accepted. Sometimes, holding back becomes irresponsible.
Western governments still behave as if being firm is impolite. It is not. It is necessary. Jewish citizens are not asking for sympathy. They want protection, enforcement, and the same seriousness given to any other kind of extremism. They are asking for a state that does its job.
If authorities keep responding with empty gestures instead of real consequences, they are not neutral observers. They are part of the failure.
This is not about grief. This is about accountability.
Enough statements. Enough ceremonies. Enough empty assurances. The situation is not “concerning.” It is unacceptable.
If governments still do not act decisively and consistently, without making exceptions for ideology, they should stop pretending they were surprised.
They were warned. Repeatedly.
Related Topics

