Michael Arizanti
Political analysis, conflict dynamics & human rights

Biden should focus on a free and independent Kurdistan!

US Vice President Joe Biden, left, and President of the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq Masoud Barzani talk during a press conference in Irbi,  350 kilometers (217 miles) north of Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, Sept. 17 2009. l(AP Photo/Yahya Ahmed)
US Vice President Joe Biden, left, and President of the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq Masoud Barzani talk during a press conference in Irbi, 350 kilometers (217 miles) north of Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, Sept. 17 2009. l(AP Photo/Yahya Ahmed)

Firstly the Kurdish issue. Understandably, they feel let down by American actions last year, however there is still the potential to foster a close alliance with them. America must play carrot and stick, offering greater support for the Self Administration but demand they cut all links and ties to the PKK. A stable, unified and autonomous Kurdish nation is potentially a silver lining of the very dark cloud of violence in Iraq and Syria over the past decade.

An independent Kurdistan would act as a bulwark against Turkish and the Iranian regime, likely forming close parntership with the alliance already blossoming between the Gulf and Israel. Simultaneously the new administration would be able to also curb Russian inflience in the region without a large American troop presence in the region through a strong Kurdish state.

Secondly, countering the narrative of political Islam across the region should be a major strand of American Middle East policy. Obama sought an accommodation with groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, failing to recognize the harder line, undemocratic societies they sought to implement. Trump has gone some way to rectify this, however his admiration of the increasingly Islamist Erdogan shows there is a considerable way to go. Biden or Trump should therefore make repudiating the damaging impacts of Islamism a top priority of their Middle East policy.

In this respect, Biden arguably recognizes the threat Erdogan and his ideology poses better than his opponent, who has shown a penchant for courting autocratic leaders. The former has labeled him an autocrat and called on them to recommit to their NATO commitments in light of closer partnership with Russia and aggression in the Eastern Mediterranean and Libya.

About the Author
Michael Arizanti is a political analyst and writer focusing on Middle East affairs, conflict dynamics, and human rights. His work examines state legitimacy, sovereignty, and post-conflict transitions across the region, with particular attention to power structures and information warfare. He examines the political and social forces shaping regional stability and governance. His work has appeared in international outlets, contributing to debates on conflict, reform, and civil rights.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.