Yochanan Schimmelpfennig

Hashem as Action: On Forgiveness and the Opening of a Future

What if the verbs in Exodus 34:6–7 — rachum (רַחוּם), chanun (חַנּוּן), erekh appayim (אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם), rav chesed (רַב־חֶסֶד) — do not describe a divine “personality,” but name what Hashem does so that life can begin again? What if forgiveness is less a feeling and more a way of making possibility where none seemed available — closer to selichah (סְלִיחָה), kapparah (כַּפָּרָה), and the first turn of teshuvah (תְּשׁוּבָה)?

Four words, four acts

  • Chen (חֵן) — not a mood of “favor,” but a moment of being noticed and admitted; a door opens where it was shut.
  • Chesed (חֶסֶד) — not vague kindness, but loyalty carried through a breach; continuity after collapse, ordered toward shalom (שָׁלוֹם) as wholeness.
  • Rachamim (רַחֲמִים) — from rechem (רֶחֶם, “womb”): re-gestation, the return of life from within, not indulgence.
  • Nacham (נָחַם) — not backward-looking regret, but re-entry by a new path; a decided change of course rather than a reversal to the same.

The formula that works

יְהוָה יְהוָה אֵל רַחוּם וְחַנּוּן אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם וְרַב־חֶסֶד וֶאֱמֶת. נֹצֵר חֶסֶד לָאֲלָפִים, נֹשֵׂא עָוֹן וָפֶשַׁע וְחַטָּאָה…

Read this “Gnadenformel” as an operative bundle: the text names acts that change the situation. Nose avon (נֹשֵׂא עָוֹן) — “bearing iniquity”; notser chesed (נֹצֵר חֶסֶד) — “guarding covenantal loyalty”; erekh appayim (אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם) — “long patience.” Numbers 14:18 makes the use explicit: Moshe invokes the formula as a working warrant for a new beginning.

Justice and mercy together

In the Hebrew Bible, mishpat (מִשְׁפָּט) and tzedek (צֶדֶק) are not the rivals of rachamim (רַחֲמִים). They are often paired — different registers of one fidelity. Later language will call this the tension of midat ha-din (מִדַּת הַדִּין) and midat ha-rachamim (מִדַּת הָרַחֲמִים). The result is neither soft leniency nor hard legalism, but a way to repair life without denying its integrity, from berit (בְּרִית, covenant) to communal practice.

The Goldberg thread

„El ist nicht der Weltschöpfer, sondern der Weltverwirklicher.”
— Oskar Goldberg, Die Wirklichkeit der Hebräer

Goldberg’s line is stark: Hashem is less a distant maker than the power that actualizes a world for a people. In this light, forgiveness (selichah, סְלִיחָה) is not sentiment; it is reintegration into a stream of reality — a return to efficacy and belonging for Israel (יִשְׂרָאֵל). The past is not erased; a derekh chadashah (דֶּרֶךְ חֲדָשָׁה), a new way through, is opened.

How to read it in practice

  1. Start with genre. Tefillah (תְּפִלָּה, plea), mizmor (מִזְמוֹר, hymn), sipur (סִפּוּר, narrative), viddui (וִדּוּי, confession) — the same word works differently in each.
  2. Track the formula. Where Exodus 34:6–7 is quoted, what is cited, what is trimmed, and what changes afterward?
  3. Watch the pairings. When chen (חֵן) or chesed (חֶסֶד) appear with mishpat/tzedek</em), expect coupling, not contrast.
  4. Keep the communal lens. The primary addressee is Israel; the individual receives through the people’s renewed life.

Conclusion

To say that Hashem is “merciful” (rachum, רַחוּם) is to say that the world can be refounded — that a blocked future can open, not because guilt (avonot, עֲוֹנוֹת) is forgotten, but because a new path becomes available. Forgiveness is not amnesia; it is the craft of beginning again.

Yochanan Schimmelpfennig
Independent Researcher / Possest Institute

About the Author
Yochanan Schimmelpfennig is a Sephardic philosopher and independent researcher with academic training in political science, the social sciences, and philosophy (university level). He developed the Possest–PQF framework (Philosophical–Quantitative Filtration) and is co-author, with Andityas Matos, of Kabbalah Antision. His work examines language as a political instrument, exile and belonging, Jewish identity, and the procedural mechanisms through which modern institutions sort legitimacy, visibility, and dissent. He writes in a deliberately mechanistic register, treating culture and politics less as “opinions” than as operational systems that shape what can still count as real, permissible, and shared.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.