Is It Time to Retire the Dinosaurs?

Since President Trump appointed Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, I have been struck by how unconventional this choice is. Traditionally, this role has been filled by seasoned military leaders—often retired five-star generals who embody an era of hierarchical leadership and conventional thinking. Hegseth, however, represents a significant departure from that tradition.

A Princeton University graduate with a degree in Political Science, Hegseth began his military career as a platoon commander in the New Jersey National Guard. He eventually rose to the rank of Army Major, gaining combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Outside the military, Hegseth has distinguished himself as a political activist, notably serving as the leader of Concerned Veterans for America. Additionally, he is widely recognized as a public figure through his work as a regular contributor to Fox News, where his appearances on Fox & Friends and Fox Nation have earned him considerable attention.

Hegseth’s diverse background and modern approach clearly distinguish him from the archetype of a traditional five-star general—a so-called dinosaur.

Why is Hegseth’s example relevant to Israel today?

It is no secret that some senior figures in Israel’s military and intelligence communities—those I would describe as “dinosaurs”—have, through arrogance and overconfidence, failed to recognize critical warning signs. These misjudgments may have contributed to the tragic events of October 7, 2023. This raises an important question: Should these entrenched figures be replaced with younger, more dynamic leaders?

My answer is both yes and no.

Yes, it is essential to bring in younger leaders, empowering them to analyze, decide, and execute. Fresh perspectives and innovative thinking are indispensable for addressing modern challenges.

No, it would be a mistake to discard the “dinosaurs” outright. Their experience, institutional knowledge, and instincts remain invaluable. The key lies in balance: younger leaders should take the initiative in decision-making and execution, while older leaders contribute through critical analysis, collaborative decision-making, and oversight.

Naturally, disagreements between these two groups are inevitable. When they occur, a supreme authority—a president, prime minister, or another designated leader—must have the ultimate responsibility to make the final decision.

This collaborative framework combines the energy and creativity of youth with the wisdom and experience of seasoned leaders, offering a comprehensive and forward-looking approach to leadership.

How do we implement this?

First, by acknowledging its importance. Second, by institutionalizing this approach and making it a standard parameter for evaluating situations and decision-making processes.

The events of the past are, in many ways, immutable—like an umpire’s whistle signaling a call that cannot be reversed. What truly matters now is what we do moving forward. By adopting a balanced and dynamic approach to leadership, we can shape the future in a way that is both effective and resilient.