Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews -- For those who like their news and truths frank and sharp

The ‘betrayer of Anne Frank’ still falsely maligned

Will those making money from false accusations escape justice?

Immediately, many reported that Arnold van den Berg, the Jewish notary recently capriciously accused of betraying Anne Frank, did not have the character, track record, information, motive, or opportunity to betray the world-famous diarist as that new, flimsy book and its publicity allege.

Within days after the publishers and ‘research team’ lifted the embargo on the book, knowledgeable Dutch Jews and specialized Dutch historians, without exception, trashed the shocking but baseless conclusions. It was deemed shoddy, amateurish, unscientific, and, in short, a bunch of nonsense. As I blogged extensively and promptly, in English, to no avail.

Other early appeals to the American publisher were ignored too. Even an early petition by the European Jewish Congress fell on deaf ears. After a couple of months, Dutch historians specialized in the Holocaust and WW II published a book detailing all the mistakes. That refutation was reason enough for the Dutch publisher to recall the malicious book. But the 69-page English translation of the historians’ repudiation had no influence on publishers in many other languages and YouTube publishers that, to this day, continue to make money out of this slander. Many times, I reported to YouTube these clips, seen by millions, but they just kept them on. Amazon finally has the libelous book on sale (60% off) but still is selling it.

Now, a newer, most thorough rejection so far, going over every flawed detail, has appeared in English, and the Algemeiner reported it. Everyone’s excuse that they didn’t know this was baseless slander is now dead.

Then, how do English, Spanish, German, and other publishers still dare to continue spreading this defamation about a dead Jew who can’t defend himself? He was, if anything, a through-and-through decent person if not a measure of a war hero for, as a dignitary, protecting many Jewish victims of the Nazis for as long as he could until he had to go into hiding.

I somehow would wish that the alive relatives of the falsely accused would receive the emotional and financial support to sue the pants of those who made and still make money off this libel. I don’t wish ill on anyone, but just for justice’s sake, let’s right this wrong. It needs quite a lot of publicity to undo all the undeserved bad press this noble Jews has received 70 years after his demise. But, a trial would also be a warning to other amateurs on any subject to ensure they know what they’re talking about before they drag someone’s name through the mud because it would sell like hotcakes.

I’m not sure, though, if the self-appointed judges in this kangaroo court were malicious at any point. We’ve seen it before: amateurs who were hypercritical and exhaustive when rejecting standing scientific research but then, about their own flimsy theory, forgot to dissect it, and then were too stubborn to admit to having nothing to show for themselves.

These ‘researchers,’ after spending much time and money with no results but lots of dead ends, made a desperate jump to a theory they both didn’t substantiate properly nor did they scrutinize. I don’t think that their aim at any point was fame or money. Rather, because of human weakness and amateurism, they could not draw the logical conclusion that it was a pity of all effort, time, and money, but nothing was found. That’s scientists’ daily bread. If one historian would have been interested to join them, s/he could have told them, though the others would probably have voted her down; the most likely reason why no historian wanted to work with them.

True, the amateur slanderers had twisted the facts a bit and boasted and exaggerated their thoroughness and expertise, but I’m not sure if that was to such a degree that that could be called deceitful and fraudulent.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe too, here: or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (, born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here:
Related Topics
Related Posts