Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Physics, Politics, Sociology, Philosophy, Judaism, etc.

The more freedom to leave a comment, the more I read those outlets

The news has worsened from evenhanded twaddle to polarized propaganda

I’m an activist—call me old-fashioned. When I read a bad news report, it was a waste of my time. Unless … I could leave a comment pointing out the truth. Yet, many outlets don’t let me criticize their ‘perfect’ reporting more than twice. That just means I’ll read them less. Far less.

The Internet paper that I like best has the most tolerance for my remarks. It also has, hands-down, the most nonsense articles and headlines. But, that is largely neutralized when I get to point out the (medical) mistakes. And for them: There is no such thing as a bad press. It makes them money.

I also like it when I can comment on comments of others. Not to make them change their minds. To teach how to do hasbara when something Antisemitic, Anti-Zionistic, racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, ultra-nationalistic, or otherwise bigoted or supremacist is written.

When I read news that is incorrect, some publishers let you give them feedback. Some take it seriously and amend their reporting. Some do neither. Guess which ones I’ll continue to give feedback and take seriously.

I don’t read reports that write the obvious. ‘The opposition leader sharply panned the PM.’ It’s his job, no? ‘calling him evil.’ I don’t need the slander.

When a right-wing outlet admits a left-wing talking point (or vice versa), I’m interested. But when they just spew their one-sided view on the situation, I find reading the propaganda a waste of my time.

And then, much of the free press prostitutes itself to a number of rich or influential organizations that pay to get their opinions published as facts. No protest will help because we talk as the one who feeds us.

I know of a famous news desk that enforces certain ways of reporting on honest journalists, terrified to lose their jobs. When they sneak in truths that don’t fit their bosses’ narratives, their writing is always ‘edited.’

When I was young, serious news came from newspapers only, written by intellectuals mostly. They also controlled the Letters section. The way they feigned objectivity was by always writing about the two sides of the coin. What they really did was blurring any issue into a fuzzy picture, unsuitable as a basis for activism. My father, of proud working-class extraction, could not stand the wishy-washy: “On one side …” immediately interrupting it with: “On the other side, rain enters through the open window.” I know someone who interrupts “On the one hand” with: “Five fingers.”

Much national and international news often depends on a national or international press agency. It only takes one dedicated Antisemite to guarantee that the whole bureau spreads Jew-hatred. This may be done together with neutral or loving pieces on Jews to ‘prove’ impartiality.

Now we have a lot of outlets who cater to and pamper their own public. Not only won’t they break their mantras. They also will keep everything politically correct or woke, or on the other side, capitalist and ‘common sense.’ A variety of them is essential for democracy, but individually, they are a threat to it because they create and maintain information bubbles.

And then there are the journals that write to keep the readers entertained and busy. Yet another trick to prevent activism.

Who was it who said: “When you notice something broken, it is your job to (help) repair it”? And, we need all-hands-on-deck.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Of the 15 (!) books he has in mind, the next two are about homosexuality in Judaism and new rabbinics. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2600 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog that also may contain updates to Times of Israel posts, to which one may subscribe, here: https://mmvanzuiden.wordpress.com/ or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * He's getting ready to publicize books on: "Free Will, "Judaism and Homosexuality, "His parents in the Holocaust, "Judaism, "A New Torah Translation and "A New Hebrew Grammar, "Co-Counseling, "Vegan Facts, "Immortality, and more. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He agrees that in a post-truth world, that's irrelevant, but then this is for the record. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (https://diethylstilbestrol.co.uk/studies/des-and-psychological-health/), born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. His posts are spell, grammar, and style polished by AI, but all written by himself. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here: https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AMoshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&s=relevancerank&text=Moshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.