Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews -- For those who like their news and truths frank and sharp

There are no second-class citizens, only second-rate democrats

Before I start criticizing the newest discriminatory Israeli law, let me make very clear that racism and other bigotries are part of almost any group and every nation. These are never used as a pretext to justify delegitimizing those people or states except in one case, that of the Jewish Nation State. Therefore, no matter how flawed Israel may be, delegitimizing it, is baseless hatred against Jews or anti-Semitism. I will have no part in that.

Sometimes we owe a lot of gratitude to stupid or evil individuals. Their arguments sometimes give us clearer guidance than any of our good ideas (where not to go). So hurray for this imbecile op-ed that claims that Arab Palestinian leaders always fought for one State for one people (Gentile Arabs) with one official language (Arabic) and one state religion (Islam), so Israel is OK when it does the same: one State, only centered around Jews, Hebrew and Judaism. Of course, this is too crazy. Israel is not the counterpart of an Arab Palestinian State – it is the alternative to it.

Whether there will ever be an Arab Palestinian State or not, and whether it will be in Gaza, part of the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon or the Sinai (or combinations), there will be non-Jews living in Israel and they need to be equal for the law.

Israel needs to be Jewish, the Homeland of the Jewish People, but it also needs to be thoroughly democratic with no second-class citizens. That can be a challenge but there is no compromise on either of these two principles. I’m not the only one who thinks so. A recent poll shows that 60% of Israeli Jews think that the law should guarantee equality for all Israeli citizens. That means that when we see high percentages agreeing with the new law, that happened by believing the lie that the new law does not threaten equality.


I must admit that I feel frustrated and embarrassed as a Jew that my country just adopted a law making the two million Arab Israelis second-rate nationals. I haven’t written about this before because I couldn’t believe that this would become law here. Of course, I’m very proud of our President who has made fun of this new law as much as he’s allowed.

I’m also proud of the high-raking Druze IDF personnel that has resigned and I really hope that the Druze community (different from Druze MKs who caved in and Druze leaders who’re about to) will not fall for the “special” considerations that have just been offered (to separate them from other Gentile Israelis) which are a total embarrassment – of us. The only honorable way is to wholly reject the nonsense, as this Druze mayor did.

Reportedly, the ‘Druze’ amendment would ensure eligibility for benefits and help achieve social equality of members of minority populations of all faiths and communities who serve in Israel’s security forces. May we therefore assume that Israel’s ultra-Orthodox Jews will soon equal Israeli Arabs? O sorry, that won’t happen because they sit in the government. Some are more equal than others.

Now I know how USers felt when their democracy had produced a money-grabbing lying abusive belligerent bigoted lazy clown for President.

And this is how one answers those clever people who try to argue that what is wrong is right, that the new law does not create any inequality. Look at the PM’s proposed corrections for the Druse. What is there to right if there were nothing wrong with the law for Gentiles?!

I hope that our High Court of Justice will shoot down the rubbish law.

Lack of Equality is the Problem, Not the Solution

Meanwhile, we need to honor all Arabs. Even if their majority would hate Jews – let’s honor their pure soul. We don’t need to go kamikaze, give up defending ourselves, intermarry ourselves out of existence, bend over backwards. But we do need to show that lack of equality, implicating hatred or at least contempt, is the problem, not the solution.

We don’t need to honor Arab Palestinians because we feel for them. We need to do so, so that we can live with ourselves, elevated among the Nations, as we should, worthy of being their teachers. Of course, we need to respect ourselves, as I recently stressed, but not just ourselves.

A People for 2000 years seen as second-class (and in many counties still) must not do this to others now we finally have some national power. I can’t understand that this shame is put on us under the leadership of a PM who has a deep knowledge of history and love for the Jewish People.

Israel is Different

For the record, I would like to point out that the vast majority of the Israeli population (Jews and Muslims) has roots in Arab countries and culture. Different from the situation in Europe and the US, Whites are in the minority here. That does not erase racism, just like women being in the majority does not undo sexism.

And among Jews, the intermarriage rate between Arab and Western Jews is so high that the two segments cannot be told apart in statistic research. So much for us being racist.

A total lack of making a difference between Jews and Muslims is in Israeli health care, where all doctors and nurses work and patients lie side-by-side, regardless of their roots or religions. Only the cleaners are all Muslims – they’re not part of the bubble.

Also, the IDF tries to be a melting pot for all those who serve, with many rules trying to support minorities to be in the armed forces in equality.

It’s probably no coincidence that especially Druze generals and physicians protest the apartheid legislation.

Last but not least, a sobering thought or two about the un-holiness of law.

The Futility and Immorality of Civil Law

Jewish religious Law agrees that we should obey Civil Law (unless it’s totally immoral, like Nazi law) because, without any government, people would eat each other alive. Generally, some law is better than no law.

(Some argue that in the Jewish State, Jewish Law should govern so that here we should not have Civil Law, but that’s a separate discussion.)

A senior Israeli lawyer who is religious once told me: Whoever looks at all jurisprudence, judicial president-creating decisions by the Israeli Supreme Court? It’s not worth the paper it’s written on. Comes another law or interpretation and the presidents even become irrelevant. But look at Torah Law. The Mishnah of thousands of years ago is still studied and relevant. Because the former is nonsensical and the latter is Truth.

(Sure, it is hard when rabbis were erroneous, like declaring Gentiles (originally: idol worshippers) subhuman or the sexuality of homosexuals an error of G^d. This is hard to emerge from because such mistakes stay relevant until consensus removes them. Don’t hold your breath.)

This all came to mind when I thought about the catastrophe about to happen with Trump proposing and Congress approving a next conservative justice to the US Supreme Court. A disaster for decades that only can be stopped by the Lord Himself – and He tries to stay out of politics.

Hard-won progress in interpreting the supposedly superior US Constitution suddenly will completely disappear. Support for women deciding to keep their own pregnancies or not, will melt away. Gay marriage and their right to protection against discrimination will become obsolete. And much-needed change like a ban on assault rifles in hands of the public or protection for transgenders will stay out of reach. Though, no doubt, state-sponsored slavery will not be reintroduced.

Not because they are good or bad ideas but because the majority of politically approved judges happens to be present-day conservative.

Nothing shows better than this arbitrary fluidity, that State Law is not about Truth or Justice at all but rather is futility, the craze of the times and a dictatorship of the (chance) majority. Moral sensitivity and progress develop within the People, not within the law.

It shames the (rule of) law. Or better: It shows the honor we should (not) feel for it. Civil Law is something to obey but not to glorify. It’s still better than Nazi Law or no law, but for the rest, nothing to be proud of.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2000 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe too, here: or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (, born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here:
Related Topics
Related Posts