Washington speaks of a deal. Jerusalem speaks of resolution.

Washington, last night. Closed door. A prolonged meeting. No questions, no statements. A sharp message emerged: no decisive agreement, no resolution. “We continue with Tehran. A deal is preferable at this stage to another campaign.” The Prime Minister’s Office confined itself to a narrow formula: close coordination and the presentation of Israel’s requirements within the negotiations.
The conclusion not written in the communiqué is clear: no agreement between Washington and Tehran binds Jerusalem. Not politically, not legally, not morally. The Vienna Convention is explicit: a treaty creates no obligations for a third state without its consent. That is a sovereign boundary. Israeli civilian security is not subject to an American timetable or external political calculation. Documents are not reality. One question remains: has the threat been removed, or does it stand.
The strategic error is to reduce the Iranian threat to the nuclear file alone. Tehran constructed an integrated system: a nuclear umbrella, ballistic missiles as instruments of decision, and proxies as forward arms. The 12-day war in June 2025 demonstrated the structure. Hundreds of ballistic missiles and thousands of drones were launched at Israel. This was not an incident. It was an infrastructure of fire. Continuous fire pressure on the home front. When Tehran states openly that its missile capability is non-negotiable, the meaning is direct: the fist remains raised even if an agreement is signed.
On the nuclear issue itself, there is no room for illusion. Partial oversight, incomplete verification of stockpiles, and preserved engineering capacity mean one thing: capability did not disappear. Even after previous strikes, the assessment was clear: delayed, not destroyed. Diplomacy can defer. It does not erase.
The matter is not only fissile material. It is method. Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza. The Houthis in Yemen. Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. Funding, training, arming, direction. A multi-theatre offensive architecture. When a state fires directly while operating proxies in parallel, this is not influence. It is doctrine.
The internal dimension completes the picture. Waves of protest have been met with repression, live fire, mass arrests, executions. A regime sustained by a myth of invincibility and outward intimidation operates on one instinct: survival. Power assets are not relinquished. They are removed.
International law is not an obstacle. The UN Charter recognises the right of self-defence in the event of an armed attack. Direct attacks have already occurred. A sustained proxy structure, supported and directed by a state, is in place. Not punishment. Prevention.
The 12-day war also halted due to American intervention. The ceasefire was framed as an achievement. For Washington, diplomatic success. For Israel, deferred resolution. The choice remains: full action, or symbolic action.
This is an operational question. If the United States chooses not to act, or chooses a symbolic move, Israel is prepared to act alone. Depth capability. Real-time intelligence. Covert capacity. Layered defence. Since June, operational laser systems have been deployed, interceptors upgraded, and the tanker fleet expanded. Less dependence on narrow windows. Greater freedom of action.
Neutralising nuclear and ballistic capability is not symbolic. It strikes the regime’s core. Under Article 51 of the UN Charter and established practice regarding self-defence against a continuing threat, action against regime infrastructure that generates an existential threat is legitimate. When the regime itself constitutes the attack mechanism, its removal is not extraordinary. It is defensive.
The Iranian file must be closed. Not paused, not managed. Closed. To concentrate full attention on Turkey. As long as Iran is the headline – nuclear risk, missiles, proxies – Turkey benefits from the Iranian emergency. Iran organises the agenda in Washington and Brussels. It is the emergency that freezes demands. Remove the emergency, and patience ends.
Ankara understands this equation. A pressured yet surviving Iran is an asset. Decision shifts the spotlight. When the spotlight shifts, the Turkish file opens in full.
Washington may believe in gradual easing. Jerusalem does not gamble. Security is not hope. It is capability. Time was Tehran’s tool. This time, it will not be.
—
First published in Hebrew as “וושינגטון מדברת על עסקה, ירושלים מדברת על הכרעה” in Maariv, 12 February 2026. Revised and translated by the author.
