Shay Gal

Washington speaks of a deal. Jerusalem speaks of resolution.

Distance no longer protects. When the decision is taken, the reach is already in motion. Israeli Air Force F 15 fighter jets en route to strikes in Iran, June 25, 2025. (Photo credit: Israel Defense Forces)

Washington pursues diplomacy with Tehran. Jerusalem sets a harder line: no agreement binds Israel. Nuclear capability, ballistic missiles and regional proxies remain; international law permits action against a continuing threat. The question is not if, but when and how. Close Iran, and the focus shifts to Turkey. Ankara knows it benefits while Tehran remains the emergency. Remove the emergency, and the Turkish file opens in full.

Washington, last night. Closed door. A prolonged meeting. No questions, no statements. A sharp message emerged: no decisive agreement, no resolution. “We continue with Tehran. A deal is preferable at this stage to another campaign.” The Prime Minister’s Office confined itself to a narrow formula: close coordination and the presentation of Israel’s requirements within the negotiations.

The conclusion not written in the communiqué is clear: no agreement between Washington and Tehran binds Jerusalem. Not politically, not legally, not morally. The Vienna Convention is explicit: a treaty creates no obligations for a third state without its consent. That is a sovereign boundary. Israeli civilian security is not subject to an American timetable or external political calculation. Documents are not reality. One question remains: has the threat been removed, or does it stand.

The strategic error is to reduce the Iranian threat to the nuclear file alone. Tehran constructed an integrated system: a nuclear umbrella, ballistic missiles as instruments of decision, and proxies as forward arms. The 12-day war in June 2025 demonstrated the structure. Hundreds of ballistic missiles and thousands of drones were launched at Israel. This was not an incident. It was an infrastructure of fire. Continuous fire pressure on the home front. When Tehran states openly that its missile capability is non-negotiable, the meaning is direct: the fist remains raised even if an agreement is signed.

On the nuclear issue itself, there is no room for illusion. Partial oversight, incomplete verification of stockpiles, and preserved engineering capacity mean one thing: capability did not disappear. Even after previous strikes, the assessment was clear: delayed, not destroyed. Diplomacy can defer. It does not erase.

The matter is not only fissile material. It is method. Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza. The Houthis in Yemen. Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. Funding, training, arming, direction. A multi-theatre offensive architecture. When a state fires directly while operating proxies in parallel, this is not influence. It is doctrine.

The internal dimension completes the picture. Waves of protest have been met with repression, live fire, mass arrests, executions. A regime sustained by a myth of invincibility and outward intimidation operates on one instinct: survival. Power assets are not relinquished. They are removed.

International law is not an obstacle. The UN Charter recognises the right of self-defence in the event of an armed attack. Direct attacks have already occurred. A sustained proxy structure, supported and directed by a state, is in place. Not punishment. Prevention.

The 12-day war also halted due to American intervention. The ceasefire was framed as an achievement. For Washington, diplomatic success. For Israel, deferred resolution. The choice remains: full action, or symbolic action.

This is an operational question. If the United States chooses not to act, or chooses a symbolic move, Israel is prepared to act alone. Depth capability. Real-time intelligence. Covert capacity. Layered defence. Since June, operational laser systems have been deployed, interceptors upgraded, and the tanker fleet expanded. Less dependence on narrow windows. Greater freedom of action.

Neutralising nuclear and ballistic capability is not symbolic. It strikes the regime’s core. Under Article 51 of the UN Charter and established practice regarding self-defence against a continuing threat, action against regime infrastructure that generates an existential threat is legitimate. When the regime itself constitutes the attack mechanism, its removal is not extraordinary. It is defensive.

The Iranian file must be closed. Not paused, not managed. Closed. To concentrate full attention on Turkey. As long as Iran is the headline – nuclear risk, missiles, proxies – Turkey benefits from the Iranian emergency. Iran organises the agenda in Washington and Brussels. It is the emergency that freezes demands. Remove the emergency, and patience ends.

Ankara understands this equation. A pressured yet surviving Iran is an asset. Decision shifts the spotlight. When the spotlight shifts, the Turkish file opens in full.

Washington may believe in gradual easing. Jerusalem does not gamble. Security is not hope. It is capability. Time was Tehran’s tool. This time, it will not be.

First published in Hebrew as “וושינגטון מדברת על עסקה, ירושלים מדברת על הכרעה” in Maariv, 12 February 2026. Revised and translated by the author.

About the Author
Shay Gal is a senior strategic advisor and analyst specializing in international security, defense policy, geopolitical crisis management, and strategic communications. He served as Vice President of External Relations at Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), and previously held senior advisory roles for Israeli government ministers, focusing on crisis management, policy formulation, and strategic influence. Shay consults governments, senior military leaders, and global institutions on navigating complex geopolitical landscapes, shaping effective defense strategies, and fostering international strategic cooperation. His writing and analysis address international power dynamics, security challenges, economics, and leadership, offering practical insights and solutions to today’s global issues.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.