search
Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews -- For those who like their news and truths frank and sharp

Learn from Putin, Xi, et al. how evil Iran could get

One of the worst things in an imperfect world is that people who live relatively well in democracies become so naïve. Or, the opposite: start seeing dangers where they don’t exist (QAnon). In both cases, they become useless in recognizing, combatting, and ending real evil.

Iran’s threat to nuke Israel from the map is most believed by local fellow non-democrats. Most people in democracies think that it’s just verbal bullying. But, Israeli PM Bennett is playing the best card of US Biden’s playbook. He is assembling a large international coalition to shoulder the responsibility together and seems not and is not a warmonger.

Well, it’s high time to be naïve no more.

See how Putin was not too shy to invade a neighboring country in peacetime, try to kill enough military to annex the place, and when that failed, shot up cities to kill enough civilians to make the rest flee. His goals: to embarrass Biden, NATO, and Europe, to embolden his reign, to annex part of Ukraine, and wipe Ukraine’s name and national pride off the map.

So, who can still think that China can’t be seriously thinking about annexing Taiwan, even if it had to kill all 24 million civilians there? Look how it annexes Hong Kong and kills all democracy there. And they commit genocide on the couple of million Uyghurs in concentration camps. And the world is silent and passive. “Never Again” became “Always Again.”

Remember how Pol Pot and Mao killed millions of their own people!

Forget about Hitler being a ‘crazy’ exception from the past.

Remember how the US and the West practically closed their borders to Jews fleeing Hitler and refused to bomb Auschwitz. Stop being so naïve.

There simply is not even a precedent of any total tyrant who volunteered to step away from mass murder and genocide.

Iran would not just threaten to use nuclear weapons to make the world swallow its dictates as Russia tries. I would bid it would also attack.

A nuclear attack on Israel would kill probably a billion people and make a large part of the Middle East inhabitable for thousands of years. Forget about your next pilgrimage to Jerusalem or Mecca.

There is no reason to believe that would weigh on the Iranian dictators.

Secondly, it is immoral to let Israel alone kill their nuclear weapons. Israel will, but why us? Just like almost the whole of the General Assembly of the UN condemned Russia, so I expect the allied forces together to bomb the Iranian leadership to the next world and restore democracy in Iran.

This should not be an excuse for fatalism. Rather, with the enemy of the free world and all of humanity so clearly visible, collective, decisive action is easy to plan, coordinate, and execute for a better world for (almost) all.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. He doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 1500 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog, to which one may subscribe, here: https://mmvanzuiden.wordpress.com/ or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (https://diethylstilbestrol.co.uk/studies/des-and-psychological-health/), born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Comments