The art of the political exit: What Likud can learn from the Democrats

President Joe Biden’s announcement that he will “stand down” from the presidential race and endorse Vice President Kamala Harris as his replacement comes after weeks of Democratic concern about his mental acuity and ability to defeat Donald Trump. This decision offers a compelling model for managing leadership changes with subtlety and strategic foresight – and should serve as a lesson for Likud in navigating its own desperately needed leadership transition.
The Democratic Party’s approach to Biden has been marked by a careful orchestration of gradual pressure. Prominent yet less central figures within the party began to express dissent in a controlled manner, allowing for a gradual shift in the narrative rather than a sudden upheaval. This incremental buildup of criticism avoided creating a jarring disruption and prepared the public for a smooth transition. Strategic media leaks further refined the narrative, ensuring that discussions about leadership change were framed positively and strategically. By focusing on past successes while advocating for renewal, the Democrats have managed to maintain party unity and create a favorable environment for transition.
In stark contrast, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s tenure has been marred by legal controversies and increasing public discontent. Once envisioned as a pivotal leader destined to shape Israel’s future, Netanyahu’s legacy now faces a critical juncture. His past successes, including economic stabilization and the historic Abraham Accords, could have cemented his place among Israel’s great leaders had he chosen to step down after these accomplishments. However, driven by a personal mission and perhaps an addiction to power, Netanyahu opted to remain in office, with consequences that have strained Israeli politics.
During his prolonged tenure, the integrity of key institutions has deteriorated as they have become entwined with political allegiances and personal connections. Israeli society has grown increasingly divided under Netanyahu’s leadership. Strategies that prioritized political survival over national unity have further exacerbated these divisions. His legacy, tainted by ongoing legal issues and attempts to undermine democratic norms, has eroded public trust and damaged Israel’s standing on the global stage. Netanyahu, once a unifying figure, now risks being remembered as a deeply polarizing leader.
October 7 served as a turning point, shattering the illusion of Netanyahu’s invincibility and underscoring the urgent need for a leadership transition. His subsequent focus on political survival rather than national unity highlights a critical moment for Israeli politics—a moment where leadership must evolve to address contemporary challenges and restore democratic vitality.
The Democratic Party’s approach offers several actionable lessons for Likud. Emphasizing transparency and a gradual transition process can help manage the complexities of leadership change while preserving party unity. Clearly communicating the need for change and outlining a structured process for selecting a new leader can reduce uncertainty and prepare both the party and the public for a seamless shift. By framing the transition positively—highlighting past achievements while advocating for renewal—Likud can ensure a smoother transition that aligns with its values and objectives.
Maintaining party cohesion throughout the transition is also crucial. An inclusive process that addresses the concerns of various factions within the party can prevent fragmentation and preserve unity. A well-managed transition will not only help Likud navigate the complexities of leadership change but also strengthen the party’s future prospects.
As the Israeli right contemplates the developments in the US, the critical question is whether they will embrace these strategies or resist change. The ability to navigate a leadership transition with grace and strategic acumen will be essential for their political futures and the cohesion of their parties. The Democratic Party’s approach provides a valuable framework for managing leadership transitions in a way that honors past achievements while embracing the need for renewal.
In the volatile landscape of Israeli politics, mastering the art of graceful leadership transitions is more than a strategic advantage—it is crucial for sustaining party unity and advancing a coherent vision for the future. For Netanyahu, stepping aside gracefully rather than clinging to power amid disarray would be the ideal way to preserve his legacy.
When Netanyahu meets with Biden during his visit to the US this week, he would do well to take a lesson from the outgoing president: prioritizing the country’s future over individual legacy is essential for democratic renewal and national unity.