Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Physics, Politics, Sociology, Philosophy, Judaism, etc.

The simple, objective stats prove there never was a genocide in the Gaza Strip

Don’t be naïve. Antisemites are not interested in facts or proofs. They’re busy with Jew-hatred, which is not an opinion or state of mind but only an expression of dishonesty that has no place for factuality. But you should.

The numbers come from different facts, almost all of them from Chamas.

In these numbers, we ignore that some of the Gazans who died were used as human shields, sacrificed, mistakenly hit by ‘friendly fire,’ and executed by the terrorists, and also that buildings were destroyed by the terrorists.

1. Killed by War

Chamas has now put the total number of Gazan deaths at 55,000 (A).

Natural death during peace in 1.75 years for 2.3 M people is 31,000 (B).

Israel has killed 24,000 (C) terrorists. NB: An aid worker by day and a terrorist by night is a terrorist. A child with a Sten gun is a terrorist.

Innocent civilians killed: approximately A minus B minus C is zero.

The IDF is fighting the cleanest war ever; Chamas the dirtiest.

2. Population

Before the UN Court delayed its genocide case against Israel, it stated and admitted, IMHO to its chagrin, that when the population doesn’t diminish, you can’t speak of genocide. “44. The Court recalls that, in order for acts to fall within the scope of Article II of the [Genocide] Convention, ‘the intent must be to destroy at least a substantial part [my stress] of the particular group. That is demanded by the very nature of the crime of genocide: since the object and purpose of the [Genocide] Convention as a whole is to prevent the intentional destruction of groups, the part targeted must be significant enough to have an impact on the group as a whole.'” When a population grows or stays the same, it’s not subjected to genocide.

3. Famine

So, there’s no mass dying amid the 2.3 M innocent, not by war or by food scarcity, despite Chamas’ fierce ploys to create a humanitarian disaster.

4. Gender and Age

The latest UN numbers say that 40% of the dead are men (Chamas is too sexist to let women be terrorists too), 20% women, and 31% children. The UN definition of a child is someone under 18. A reasonable definition of a terrorist is a civilian with a firearm. It is reasonable to not believe these numbers at all, but for argument’s sake, using them, it is reasonable to assume that 40-20%=20% are grown terrorists; a quarter of the child deaths are child terrorists at 8%, and the full 9% missing are terrorists too, which adds up to 37% terrorists and 63% non-combat deaths. If Chamas now claims 55,000 deaths, terrorists stand at 37% of 55,000 = 21,000, with natural deaths at 31,000, then there are 6,000 dead innocent civilians.

In another frank declaration from Chamas, it admitted that 72% of combat-aged fatalities are males, ages 13-55. That means that women, girls, and underage boys are 28%. That means that at least 72%-28% = 44% of 55,000 is 24,000 are terrorists. Add to that the 31,000 natural deaths, and the number of civilian deaths is zero (which is 0.00%). Per 24,000 dead terrorists, zero civilians died as ‘collateral damage,’ 0%.

In yet another count, male deaths are 2/3 and female deaths 1/3. That means that about 1/3 of all deaths are terrorists, 18,000. With natural death at 31,000 and total deaths at 55,000, dead civilians are at 6,000.

5. Destroyed Buildings

Satellite images show that at least 70% of Gaza’s buildings are destroyed or severely damaged, with Rafah being 90% in ruin. The total number of deaths, including terrorists and natural deaths, is, according to Chamas, 55,000 or 2.4% of the population. If 70-90% of the houses were destroyed and 2.4% of the population died, civilians were not targeted!

(Empty buildings were also not targeted, as that too is a war crime if it doesn’t serve any strategic purpose. Almost all houses in Gaza had an entrance to the terror network of the ‘Gaza Underground.’)

This truth is even clearer if you consider that Israel has millions of bomb shelters for citizens, but all the Gaza bomb shelters are just for terrorists!

This not only shows that the terrorists want civilian casualties but also that the population under terrorist occupation doesn’t revolt because it knows that the IDF doesn’t target them! (If this section doesn’t open your eyes, you don’t want to know the facts, and I would like to learn why not.)

The Numbers: Conclusion

The number of dead civilians from war in almost 2 years of fighting, based on Chamas’ numbers, varies from zero to 6,000. On a population of 2.3 million, during mostly urban warfare, that dismisses famine and genocide.

True Genocide

Chamas itself admitted with pride that the goal of the pogrom on Simchat Torah was genocide, conform its founding documents’ ‘ideals.’ To make it qualify, it has stated over and over again that it seeks to repeat the assault.

Clearly, wanting the ME Jew-free From the River to the Sea is genocide.

The Syrian Army started to massacre the Druze. No one condemned them. Only Israel immediately tried to stop them and bombed the hell out of them. Every other country condemned Israel’s ‘aggression.’ Shocking.

Calling anything genocide makes the real genocides look uneventful.

One must be a total idiot, entirely uninformed, wholly naïve, or completely malicious to believe the numberless, baseless lies of Chamas, the UN, etc.

While the Jews were massacred in Europe for over 1000 years, they were always accused of being murderers. There is nothing new under the sun.


You may find more controversial writings on Amazon or my own blog.

About the Author
MM is a prolific and creative writer and thinker, previously a daily blog contributor to the TOI. He often makes his readers laugh, mad, or assume he's nuts—close to perfect blogging. He's proud that his analytical short comments are removed both from left-wing and right-wing news sites. None of his content is generated by the new bore on the block, AI. * As a frontier thinker, he sees things many don't yet. He's half a prophet. Half. Let's not exaggerate. Or not at all because he doesn't claim G^d talks to him. He gives him good ideas—that's all. MM doesn't believe that people observe and think in a vacuum. He, therefore, wanted a broad bio that readers interested can track a bit what (lack of) backgrounds, experiences, and educations contribute to his visions. * This year, he will prioritize getting his unpublished books published rather than just blog posts. Of the 15 (!) books he has in mind, the next two are about homosexuality in Judaism and new rabbinics. Next year, he hopes to focus on activism against human extinction. To find less-recent posts on a subject XXX among his over 2600 archived ones, go to the right-top corner of a Times of Israel page, click on the search icon and search "zuiden, XXX". One can find a second, wilder blog that also may contain updates to Times of Israel posts, to which one may subscribe, here: https://mmvanzuiden.wordpress.com/ or by clicking on the globe icon next to his picture on top. * He's getting ready to publicize books on: "Free Will, "Judaism and Homosexuality, "His parents in the Holocaust, "Judaism, "A New Torah Translation and "A New Hebrew Grammar, "Co-Counseling, "Vegan Facts, "Immortality, and more. * Like most of his readers, he believes in being friendly, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think those are his absolute top priorities, you might end up disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He agrees that in a post-truth world, that's irrelevant, but then this is for the record. He will try to stay within the limits of democratic and Jewish law, but he won't lie to support opinions or people when don't deserve that. (Yet, we all make honest mistakes, which is just fine and does not justify losing support.) He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quite a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * Sometimes he's misunderstood because his wide and diverse field of vision seldomly fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what some love about him. He has written a lot about Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science (including basic statistics), Politics (Israel, the US, and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight reality), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), the Climate Crisis, Ecology and Veganism, Affairs from the news, or the Torah Portion of the Week, or new insights that suddenly befell him. * Chronologically, his most influential teachers are his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach, and, lehavdil bein chayim lechayim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff, and Rav Meir Lubin. This short list doesn't mean to disrespect others who taught him a lot or a little. One of his rabbis calls him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim]. Yet, his originalities seem to root deeply in traditional Judaism, though they may grow in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he's modernizing nothing. Rather, mainly basing himself on the basic Hebrew Torah text, he tries to rediscover classical Jewish thought almost lost in thousands of years of stifling Gentile domination and Jewish assimilation. (He pleads for a close reading of the Torah instead of going by rough assumptions of what it would probably mean and before fleeing to Commentaries.) This, in all aspects of life, but prominently in the areas of Free Will, Activism, Homosexuality for men, and Redemption. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, and disturb the comfortable and comfort the disturbed. He aims to bring a fresh perspective rather than harp on the obvious and familiar. When he can, he loves to write encyclopedic overviews. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds should be disputed. In short, his main political positions are among others: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, anti those who abuse democratic liberties, anti the fake ME peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, pro-Science, pro-Free Will, anti-blaming-the-victim, and for down-to-earth, classical optimism, and happiness. Read his blog on how he attempts to bridge any tensions between those ideas or fields. * He is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (https://diethylstilbestrol.co.uk/studies/des-and-psychological-health/), born in 1953 to his parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork. He grew up a humble listener. It took him decades to become a speaker too, and decades more to admit to being a genius. But his humility was his to keep. And so was his honesty. Bullies and con artists almost instantaneously envy and hate him. He hopes to bring new things and not just preach to the choir. * He holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He practices Re-evaluation Co-counseling since 1977, is not an official teacher anymore, and became a friendly, powerful therapist. He became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years, he was active in hasbara to the Dutch-speaking public. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a strict vegan since 2008. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second-generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. If you're a native English speaker and wonder why you should read from people whose English is only their second language, consider the advantage of having an original peek outside of your cultural bubble. His posts are spell, grammar, and style polished by AI, but all written by himself. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me. * His newest books you may find here: https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AMoshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&s=relevancerank&text=Moshe-Mordechai%2FMaurits+van+Zuiden&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1
Related Topics
Related Posts
Sign in or Register
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.