Rarely does one read or hear such a statement. In fact, we seldom allow ourselves optimism or hope in a world that seems determined to find negativity and yet another excuse not to get off the sofa, because tomorrow at 18:48 the apocalypse is apparently arriving and there is no possible escape.

Leaving aside the Prophets of Chaos, the current Russo-Ukrainian war seems to have taken an unexpected turn for what was supposed to be a Special Military Operation that, one might say, has lasted somewhat longer than expected in the Kremlin.

For this contemporary war truly exposes the end of the bipolar world: the old Soviet bloc versus the Allied bloc, both of which may have changed colours but still reflect the same underlying theological problem.

For the pursuit of efficiency combined with social justice, and the rejection of the Golden Calf’s interest, was once the distinctive red theological banner of a lost Israel wandering through the Siberian taiga, challenging the Imperial Capitalist powers for a time.

Its red victories delayed a process of civilisation and rectification of souls that, in the Black Continent, still awaits its turn. I do not intend to justify abuses or the wrongdoing of any power or individual; each carries his own Tikun. Yet it is worth noting that many of Europe’s present troubles stem from ignoring the children of Ham, who must fulfil the purpose for which Hashem created them. More than ever, the light of Israel must illuminate the paths of a forgotten continent, condemned for decades beneath the shadow of the power now called Russia.

For what the eyes of man see is merely the skin colour of the one giving the order and the one obeying it. But whoever understands Tikun understands that the Torah does not demand the disappearance of nations, but their proper ordering. It is one thing to cooperate in justice, and quite another to dissolve oneself into the suicidal Babel of our Aryan propaganda.

Yet the ideologies of the interwar years created a cloud of toxic gas so thick that it no longer allows us to recognise the face of Jacob, sowing division among souls and confusion among nations.

For the poison of Baal through the State and the worship of the Golden Calf remain powerful idols. Yet, quite astutely, NATO achieved a total victory over its old adversary, once again defeated just as it was in 1991.

Western-made bombs now fall upon Moscow. Ukraine may be the one pressing the button, but the AKs that once fuelled anti-colonial revolutions also carried the CCCP stamp.

“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” some might say from the war room.

I merely watch the wheel continue turning, collecting and settling Tikun from other lives.

Communism as an ideology has been thoroughly neutralised by various figures and factions who, since the 1960s, have been constructing a new communism detached from the Soviet model. Thus emerged the contemporary Woke phenomenon, born from cultural Marxism and Western elites flirting with a watered-down communism.

Put differently, many of those who today defend communism or leftism would have been little more than Gulag fodder. The irony is that modern Russia is now portrayed as both “the embodiment of fascism” and “the saviour of the Christian white world.”

I went there looking for that promise. I did not find it after three years.

Real Russia is certainly authoritarian. Calling it fascist would be inaccurate, yet by Western standards “ultra-fascist” would hardly be an exaggeration, even if it comes decorated with a hammer and sickle and a portrait of Saint Lenin hanging on the wall.

Russia’s spiritual stillness produces a conservative character in contrast to a West that loves transformation for transformation’s sake. Undeniably Futurist and, by supreme irony, authentically Fascist in its own way. For neoclassicism is Socialist Realism, and Socialist Realism is not entirely alien to the Reich either.

So then:

Who is the fascist today?

I tend to judge people by their actions rather than their intentions. A total NATO victory over Russia would be suicidal for the West itself, not because someone might press the nuclear button first, but because of the profound geopolitical consequences such a victory would unleash in the long run.

When Stalin redrew the map of Eastern Europe, making it more Slavic, he scarcely imagined the consequences his actions would have today. Those who yesterday were anti-Russian Germans are now Poles, Balts, Ukrainians, and others. Mass deportations rarely achieve the intended result; the most successful Gulags, one might argue, are still operating perfectly well.

The simple fact that Russia cannot impose itself on the Ukrainian battlefield using Soviet tactics and Soviet equipment demonstrates that the technological window for creating a pro-Russian Socialist Europe in the style of 1945 has closed.

After all, it cannot defeat what is, in relative terms, an insignificant Ukraine—albeit one heavily doped by NATO.

So then:

What exactly is the fear of Armatas rolling into Lisbon?

Is the enemy truly in the Urals, or is it at home?

And what if NATO’s total victory consists merely of stopping the one player capable of disrupting the new Roaring Twenties that seem to be approaching?

One need not be a Prophet of Chaos to understand that new generations are coming to collect Tikun from the wars of yesterday. Defeated ideas rarely disappear; they simply change their name, their flag, and their generation.

For there are indeed men ahead of their time.

Because they are driven by Tikun, not by ego.