Moshe-Mordechai van Zuiden
Psychology, Medicine, Science, Politics, Oppression, Integrity, Philosophy, Jews

Why’s the NY Times’ anti-Semitic cartoon so nasty and a simple sorry not enough?

Dog bites man is not news. Man bites dog is news. And Jewish (Israeli PM) dog leads American blind president is antisemitic. But why exactly? Jewish indignation is everywhere but explanation is scarce. Is it so obvious why this speaks of Jews’ hatred that clarification is unnecessary? I think it’s good to spell out why this is vicious hatred of Jews.

Not because dogs are so offensive, as one Muslim Clerk friendly to Jews suggested. In Islam, dogs are like what pigs are to Jews.

Not because Gentiles shouldn’t make fun of Jews in principle. Though, just like men making fun of women, big chance that it will be hateful.

Not because Trump is depicted as a blind Jew. He’s certainly morally blind in many respects and he’s definitely the most pro-Israel US President ever.

Rather, this is oppressive of the Jewish People because Netanyahu as the US president’s guide dog is saying that Jews run the world and the greatest country on earth (that’s how many USers in a failed attempt at national pride “humbly” speak about the US, not hindered by too much knowledge about other countries) must powerlessly follow their directives. (This exactly is what motivated the US synagogue shooter of the same day.) That’s a major classical antisemitic myth. (There are many other ways to explain this incident.)

This wouldn’t be so painful if it had a grain of truth in it. Sadly, the situation of Jews is exactly the opposite. They are betrayed by the working class and poor, held hostage by the truly rich and wealthy. They bear the brunt of UN abuse. Even over 100 years after modern Zionism started and reached out to Muslims to have a Jewish bi-national State, Israelis still don’t live in security and in peace.

The second reason why this cartoon is so painful and a simple apology won’t suffice is that reportedly the NY Times regularly write things that are based on the blood libel that Jews are running and ruining the world.

Then this wasn’t a small oversight. Too much of the NY Times’ reporting on Israel seems rooted in this blood libel that Jews are powerful (and evil) and the rest needs to suffer their abuse.

But it’s the reasonable decent intellectual antisemitism that — shows the cartoon — is just rooted in vile primitive irrational hatred for Jews.

If Jews really were such monsters, hatred against them would be in order. The point is that Jews are not. That Jews are not less or less moral than other Nations but often are full of ideals and principles that would help anyone. That hatred for Jews is activated to neutralize the idealistic messages of Judaism. Because, if Jews are bad people, one doesn’t need to listen to their ethics, does one?

NB: There is no antisemitism without fake news.

BTW: The second deadly synagogue shooting in the US in half a year is not a “blow to the heart of the Jewish people.” Rather, it’s a blemish to the soul of non-Jews; much like the Holocaust was the slaughter of European moral supremacy.

Talking of Jews’ hatred, why did anyone wonder if a hate crime can be proven in case of any synagogue shooting? Doesn’t sound exactly like a crime of passion to me. How could this not be a hate crime?

Coming Wednesday night-Thursday night is Holocaust Memorial Day.

About the Author
To subscribe to his daily blog posts, click on the circle next to the blogger's picture, containing a dot with two quarter circles around it (the Feed Computer icon). * The author is a fetal survivor of the pharmaceutical industry (DES - Diethylstilbestrol), born in 1953 to two Dutch survivors who met in the largest concentration camp in the Netherlands, Westerbork, and holds a BA in medicine (University of Amsterdam). He taught Re-evaluation Co-counseling, became a social activist, became religious, made Aliyah, and raised three wonderful kids. He wrote an unpublished tome about Jewish Free Will. He's a vegan for 8 years now. He's an Orthodox Jew but not a rabbi. * His most influential teachers (chronologically) are: his parents, Nico (natan) van Zuiden and Betty (beisye) Nieweg, Wim Kan, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshal Rosenberg, Reb Shlomo Carlebach and lehavdiel bein chayim lechayim: Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopes Cardozo, Rav Zev Leff and Rav Meir Lubin. * Previously, for decades, he was known to the Jerusalem Post readers as a frequent letter writer. For a couple of years he wrote hasbara for the Dutch public. His fields of attention now are varied: Psychology (including Sexuality and Abuse), Medicine (including physical immortality), Science, Politics (Israel, the US and the Netherlands, Activism - more than leftwing or rightwing, he hopes to highlight Truth), Oppression and Liberation (intersectionally, for young people, the elderly, non-Whites, women, workers, Jews, GLBTQAI, foreigners and anyone else who's dehumanized or exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Zionism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), Ecology and Veganism. Sometimes he's misunderstood because he has such a wide vision that never fits any specialist's box. But that's exactly what many love about him. Many of his posts relate to affairs from the news or the Torah Portion of the Week or are new insights that suddenly befell him. * He hopes that his words will inspire and inform, reassure the doubters but make the self-assured doubt more. He strives to bring a fresh perspective rather than bore you with the obvious. He doesn't expect his readers to agree. Rather, original minds must be disputed. In short, his main political positions are: anti-Trumpism, for Zionism, Intersectionality, non-violence, democracy, anti the fake peace process, for original-Orthodoxy, Science, Free Will, anti blaming-the-victim and for down-to-earth optimism. Read his blog how he attempts to bridge any discrepancies. He admits sometimes exaggerating to make a point, which could have him come across as nasty, while in actuality, he's quit a lovely person to interact with. He holds - how Dutch - that a strong opinion doesn't imply intolerance of other views. * His writing has been made possible by an allowance for second generation Holocaust survivors from the Netherlands. It has been his dream since he was 38 to try to make a difference by teaching through writing. He had three times 9-out-of-10 for Dutch at his high school finals but is spending his days communicating in English and Hebrew - how ironic. G-d must have a fine sense of humor. In case you wonder - yes, he is a bit dyslectic. November 13, 2018, he published his 500st blog post with the ToI. * He likes doing age-appropriate and age-inappropriate things and looks forward to getting to know his timeless mature out-of-the-box soul mate. * To send any personal reaction to him, scroll to the top of the blog post and click Contact Me.
Related Topics
Related Posts
Comments